The potential of complementary and alternative medicine in promoting well-being and critical health literacy: a prospective, observational study of shiatsu
© Long; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 08 April 2009
Accepted: 18 June 2009
Published: 18 June 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Apr 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Apr 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Soren Ventegodt|
|16 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iris Bell|
|8 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Long|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Long|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Jun 2009||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jun 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-9-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.