Factors and common conditions associated with adolescent dietary supplement use: an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
© Gardiner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 28 June 2007
Accepted: 31 March 2008
Published: 31 March 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Jun 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Else-Lydia Toverud|
|20 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sunita Vohra|
|3 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Kathi Kemper|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rainer Ludtke|
|6 Feb 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Else-Lydia Toverud|
|20 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Kathi Kemper|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Mar 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Kathi Kemper|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|18 Mar 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|31 Mar 2008||Editorially accepted|
|31 Mar 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-8-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.