Eurythmy Therapy in clinical studies: a systematic literature review
© Büssing et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 25 December 2007
Accepted: 31 March 2008
Published: 31 March 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Dec 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Arndt Büssing|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Feb 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan Davidson|
|21 Feb 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marianne A Ch Carlsson|
|25 Feb 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Klaus Linde|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Arndt Büssing|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Arndt Büssing|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|28 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|31 Mar 2008||Editorially accepted|
|31 Mar 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-8-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.