Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Patient satisfaction and side effects in primary care: An observational study comparing homeopathy and conventional medicine

  • Florica Marian1,
  • Kerstin Joost1,
  • Krishan D Saini1,
  • Klaus von Ammon1,
  • André Thurneysen1 and
  • André Busato2Email author
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)20088:52

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-8-52

Received: 17 October 2007

Accepted: 18 September 2008

Published: 18 September 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Roblin
29 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Kalda
21 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Andre Busato
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Andre Busato
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Roblin
5 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Fisher
12 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - Andre Busato
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Fisher
5 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Andre Busato
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
4 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Andre Busato
Resubmission - Version 7
4 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
12 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Andre Busato
Resubmission - Version 9
12 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
18 Sep 2008 Editorially accepted
18 Sep 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-8-52

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Complementary Medicine KIKOM, University of Bern, Imhoof Pavillon
(2)
Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern

Advertisement