Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Dietary supplement use among health care professionals enrolled in an online curriculum on herbs and dietary supplements

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)20066:21

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-21

Received: 19 April 2006

Accepted: 12 June 2006

Published: 12 June 2006

Abstract

Background

Although many health care professionals (HCPs) in the United States have been educated about and recommend dietary supplements, little is known about their personal use of dietary supplements and factors associated with their use.

Methods

We surveyed HCPs at the point of their enrollment in an on-line course about dietary supplements between September, 2004 and May, 2005. We used multivariable logistic regression to analyze demographic and practice factors associated with use of dietary supplements.

Results

Of the 1249 health care professionals surveyed, 81 % reported having used a vitamin, mineral, or other non-herbal dietary supplements in the last week. Use varied by profession with highest rates among nurses (88%), physician assistants or nurse practitioners (84 %) and the lowest rates among pharmacists (66%) and trainees (72%). The most frequently used supplements were multivitamins (60%), calcium (40%), vitamin B (31%), vitamin C (30%), and fish oil (24%). Factors associated with higher supplement use were older age, female, high knowledge of dietary supplements, and discussing dietary supplements with patients. In our adjusted model, nurses were more likely than other professionals to use a multivitamin and students were more likely to use calcium.

Conclusion

Among HCPs enrolled in an on-line course about dietary supplements, women, older clinicians, those with higher knowledge and those who talk with patients about dietary supplements had higher use of dietary supplements. Additional research is necessary to understand the impact of professionals' personal use of dietary supplements on communication with patients about them.

Background

Vitamins, minerals and dietary supplements are among the most commonly used complementary or alternative medical (CAM) therapies in the United States [1, 2]. Health care professional's personal use of dietary supplements is of interest for several reasons. Patients ask health care professionals (HCP) to provide advice about vitamins, minerals, and other dietary supplements, and a health care professional's personal health habits may affect whether they will recommend a dietary supplement [3]. In health care professional training programs, many health care professionals learn about the role that nutrition and dietary supplements play in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases such as osteoporosis, heart disease, cancer, and neural tube defects [47]. For example, federal and national guidelines have recommended that women take calcium and vitamin D for the prevention of osteoporosis; [812] that patients take fish oil for the prevention of heart disease and hypertension; [1315] that women of child-bearing age take folate for the prevention of neutral tube defects in infants [1618] and people over age 50 consume vitamin B12 [17].

Few studies have looked at the extent to which health care professionals (HCPs) follow these dietary supplement guidelines personally, and if their own dietary supplement use influences their willingness recommend and communicate with patients about dietary supplements.

Additionally, little is known about the relationship between HCP's use and demographic or professional characteristics such as age, gender, professional group, knowledge or confidence about recommending dietary supplements [1923].

Using data from a cross sectional survey of health care professionals enrolled in an online curriculum about dietary supplements, we examined overall prevalence of dietary supplement use by profession; personal and professional factors associated with supplement use; and the relationship between specific supplements used and knowledge, confidence, and self reported communication with patients about dietary supplements.

We hypothesized that as it is in the general public, dietary supplement use would be more common among female health care professionals and middle-aged or older health care professionals. Further, we hypothesized that personal use of vitamins, minerals and dietary supplements would be significantly associated with greater knowledge about, greater confidence in talking about, and more frequent communication with patients about herbs and dietary supplements.

Methods

This was a cross sectional survey of all participants prior to the start of a web based dietary supplements curriculum. Questions included participants' personal use of vitamins, minerals, and other dietary supplements excluding herbs, demographic and professional characteristics, and questions to assess knowledge about dietary supplements. We excluded herbs in this analysis, because herbs are not traditionally taught about in health care professional schools for treatment and prevention of medical conditions, thus we would not expect for health care practitioners to have professional knowledge of them. Herb use among these professionals has been described in a separate report [24].

Recruitment

The recruitment protocol for our on-line dietary supplement education trial has been described previously [25]. Overall, from 2004 to 2005, we sent approximately 59,000 email announcements and 19,500 flyers to medical schools, health professional groups and continuing medical education programs nationwide [25]. Respondents were recruited to a webpage, and registration occurred on-line through the North Carolina Northwest Area Health Education Center (NW AHEC).

Following registration, participants completed the baseline questionnaire on-line. Participants were eligible for our analysis if they were in one of the following professional groups: physicians; clinical nurses; physician assistants or nurse practitioners (NP or PA); pharmacists; dietitians; or trainees in one of these health professions. This resulted in a total sample of 1249 eligible participants.

Survey instrument

The survey instrument used in this project was based on a previous pilot study and has been described elsewhere [25]. In addition to demographic data, participants were asked about their profession and if they had seen any patients in the prior 30 days. Personal use of dietary supplements in the last week was evaluated with a list of approximately 59 herbs and 27 vitamins, minerals and other dietary supplements.

Knowledge scores were assessed with 28 true/false and multiple choice questions about commonly used dietary supplements. Scores could range from 0 to 100% correct. The knowledge questions included inquires on the use and safety of commonly used herbs and dietary supplements such as vitamins/minerals, folate, chromium, vitamin D; and other dietary supplements such as creatine, glucosamine, Coenzyme Q10, and fish oil. [see Additional file 1] Knowledge scores were divided into three categories with scores (percent of questions answered correctly), with scores ≤ 58% correct considered low (N = 364), 59–69% as medium (N = 483), and ≥70% as high (N = 402).

A confidence scale was designed to measure respondent's confidence in answering patient questions and making recommendations about dietary supplements to patients. The score was derived from responses to 19 Likert-type questions (strongly disagree, disagree, neutral/not sure, agree, strongly agree) such as "I feel confident responding to patients' questions about HDS."; "I can warn patients about side effects of commonly used herbs and dietary supplements." [see Additional file 1] Each item was scored 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with a minimum score of 19 and maximum of 95. The Cronbach alpha reliability statistic was 0.96 for the scale. The confidence score was divided into approximate quartiles: low (N = 387), medium (N = 289), high (N = 275), and very high (N = 297).

Communication scale: The subset of respondents (N = 1176) who reported having seen patients in the 30 days prior to the survey were asked about communication with patients about dietary supplement use. (e.g., "In the past 30 days, in what percentage of your clinical encounters have you discussed with a patient or family the use of herbs and dietary supplements?"). Respondents marked the percentage of times they discussed herbs and dietary supplements on a scale of 0 to 100%. Potential scores could range from 0 to 10. This response was dichotomized (yes or no) into a variable "discussed with patients".

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to examine the prevalence of dietary supplement use and the most common dietary supplements. Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions of characteristics in individual dietary supplement users versus non-users. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine demographic and clinical practice characteristics associated with use of vitamin, mineral and other dietary supplements reported by as used by ≥15 % of the respondents. Based on prior analyses and the bivariate results, eight variables were selected for multivariable analysis in single step modeling: age, gender, race/ethnicity, geographic residence (North Carolina versus elsewhere), profession, knowledge score, confidence score, and the "discussed with patients" variable [25]. Among the professions, physician assistants and nurse practitioners were grouped together due to their similar degree of advanced training and ability to prescribe medications. All analyses were performed using SAS-9 [26]. This study was approved as "exempt" as an educational research project by the Wake Forest University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Results

Of the 1249 health care professionals surveyed, 21% were physicians, 16% were clinical nurses, 6% were nurse practitioners or physician assistants, 11% were dieticians, 3% were pharmacists, 37% were students, and 7% were residents or fellows. The average age was 40.3 ± 12.9 years, 25% percent were men; 83% were Caucasian, 8% were Asian, 5 % were African American, and less than 1% were Native American/Alaskan Native. Forty seven percent of respondents lived outside North Carolina. Among health care professionals who had seen patients in the past month, 57% reported having discussed dietary supplements with patients at least once. The average knowledge score was 65.8 ± 10.7% correct.

Overall, 81 % reported having used a vitamin mineral or other dietary supplements, 79% reported using a vitamin or mineral, and 35% reported using another non-herb dietary supplement in the last week. The most commonly used were multivitamins (60%), calcium (40%), vitamin B (31%), vitamin C (30%), fish oil (24%), vitamin E (23%), vitamin D and folate (15% each) (Table 1).
Table 1

Frequency of vitamin, mineral and other dietary supplements

 

N = 1249

 

Dietary supplement

N

% of respondents using

Any Vitamin

942

75

Multivitamins

762

60

Vitamin B

382

31

C Vitamin

373

30

E Vitamin

286

23

Folate model

187

15.

D Vitamin

192

15

Niacin, B3

95

8

Vitamin K

74

6

Lutein

49

4

Any Mineral

567

45

Calcium

495

40

Magnesium

158

13

Iron

122

10

Chromium

64

5

Other Dietary Supplement

438

35

Fish oil

302

24

Glucosamine

152

12

Co Q 10

128

10

Alpha linoleic acid

75

6

MSM – in plants

61

5

DHEA

32

3

Melatonin

41

3

SAM-e

17

1

Creatine

8

.6

With regard to each individual profession, use was highest among nurses (88%), nurse practitioners and physician assistants s (84%), and lowest among pharmacists (66%) and trainees (72%) (P < .01). (Table 2)
Table 2

Respondents baseline characteristics for commonly used vitamins minerals and other dietary supplements *

Characteristic

Total N (%)

Multi vitamin

Calcium

Vitamin B

Vitamin C

Fish oil

Vitamin E

Vitamin D

Folate

N

1249

754

495

382

373

295

286

192

187

  

60%

40%

31%

30%

24%

23%

15%

15%

Age

         

≤30

406 (32.5)

33

31

22

28

12

15

11

10

31–40

202 (16.2)

16

38

23

26

24

14

12

12

41–50

328 (26.3)

25

43

32

27

27

27

15

15

>50

313 (25.1)

25

49

45

38

35

35

24

23

  

P = .85

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

Gender

         

Male

316 (25)

22

19

28

31

25

23

10

11

Female

933 (75)

78

47

31

30

23

23

17

16

  

P < .001

P < .001

P = .17

P = .70

p = .50

P = .96

P = .01

P = .04

Race/Ethnic

         

African American

57 (4.6)

4

16

32

26

18

26

11

11

Asian/P.I.

95 (7.6)

7

32

16

19

16

9

12

8

Caucasian

1035 (82.9)

84

42

32

31

24

24

16

16

Native American

3 (0.2)

4

67

33

33

0

33

33

33

Declined

59 (4.7)

.3

27

34

36

29

25

20

12

  

P = .711

P < .001

P = .03

P = .13

P = .15

P = .03

P = .41

P = .19

Professional Group

         

Physician

256 (20.5)

18

34

33

29

32

26

18

19

Dietician

137 (10.97)

11

54

6

17

24

16

12

12

Nurse

203 (16.3)

19

48

45

34

28

36

19

19

PA & NP

73 (5.8)

6

51

45

38

37

26

22

19

Pharmacist

41 (3.3)

3

46

20

24

32

20

15

12

Student

458 (36.7)

37

35

28

32

14

17

13

12

Residents & fellows

81 (6.5)

6

27

19

23

20

14

9

14

  

P = .02

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

P < .001

P = .08

P = .09

NC resident

         

Yes

587 (47)

45

43

30

28

23

24

16

14

No

662 (53)

55

36

31

32

24

22

15

16

  

P = .15

P = .01

P = .85

P = .13

P = .54

P = .37

P = .78

p = .35

Knowledge Scores

Average 65.8 ± 10.7

        

High

402 (32)

35

52

38

32

36

26

19

22

Medium

483 (39)

39

37

31

30

23

23

14

14

Low

364 (29)

26

30

21

28

11

19

13

8

  

P = .007

P < .001

P < .001

P = .47

P < .001

P = .07

P = .07

P < .001

Confidence Score

         

Low

387 (31)

30

27

24

29

22

26

27

26

Medium

289 (23)

25

23

25

26

23

26

24

23

High

275 (22)

22

23

25

23

24

21

20

24

Extremely high

297 (24)

23

27

26

22

31

26

29

28

  

P = .12

P = .08

P = .01

P = .30

P < .001

P = .09

P = .21

P = .29

Discuss HDS with Patients*

         

Yes

667 (57)

56

43

34

30

30

25

18

19

No

510 (43)

44

35

25

29

16

20

11

11

  

P = .55

P = .002

P = .001

P = .70

P < .001

P = .04

P < .001

P < .001

*(15 % or > of the sample size).

Eight variables were selected for multivariable logistic regression analysis in single step modeling for adjusted association with uses of multivitamins, vitamins D, C, E, B, calcium, folate, and fish oil: age, gender, race/ethnicity, geographic residence (North Carolina versus elsewhere), profession, knowledge score, confidence score, and the "discussed with patients" variable. These results are provided in Table 3. Modeling was performed with (N = 1176) and without (N = 1249) the "discuss with patients" variable. Since results were highly similar with both, the results presented include this variable.
Table 3

Amongst health care professionals, factors associated with individual use of vitamins and minerals; adjusted multivariate logistic regression***

Characteristic

Multivit

Calcium

Vit B

Vit C

Vit E

Vit D

Folate

Fish oil

Gender

        

Male *

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Females

1.3 (.93–1.7)

3.4 (2.4–4.8)

2.3 (1.4–3.8)

.99 (.74–1.4)

.88 (.60–1.3)

2.3 (1.4–.3.8)

1.8 (1.2–2.9)

.88 (.60–1.3)

Professional Group

        

Physician *

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Nutritionist

1.3 (.80–2.1)

1.6 (.99–2.6)

.47 (.24 .92)

.56 (.32.99)

.67 (.37–1.2)

.47 (.24–.92)

.56 (.29–1.1)

.94 (.55–2.2)

Nurse

2.3 (1.4–3.6)

1.5 (.96–2.5)

.73 (.41–1.3)

.1.2 (.75–2.0)

1.6 (1.0–2.7)

.73 (.41–1.3)

1.1 (.61–1.9)

1.3 (.81–2.2)

PA and NP

1.1 (.64–2.0)

1.1 (.63–2.0)

.78 (.39–1.6)

1.4 (.79–2.5)

1.6 (.87–2.9)

.78 (.39–1.6)

.73 (.35–1.5)

1.3 (.73 –2.4)

Pharmacist

.88 (.43–1.8)

1.6 (0.78–3.5)

.77 (.29–2.1)

.91 (.40 2.1)

.81 (.33 2.0)

.77 (.29–2.1)

.67 (.24–1.9)

.99 (.43–2.2)

Student

1.4 (.87–2.2)

1.7 (1.05–2.7)

.96 (.52–1.8)

1.9 (1.2–3.1)

1.1 (.66–2.0)

.96 (.52–1.8)

1.2 (.64–2.2)

1.0 (.60–1.7)

Resident

.83 (.47–1.4)

.79 (0.42–1.5)

.35 (.12–.95)

.89 (.47–1.7)

.57 (.47–1.7)

.35 (.12–.96)

.82 (.36–1.8)

.74 (.37–1.5)

Age (years)

        

≤30*

1

1.0

1

1

1

1

 

1

31–40

.88 (.58–1.3)

1.1 (0.72–1.7)

.75 (.40–1.4)

1.1 (.70–1.7)

.93 (.53–1.6)

.75 (.40–1.4)

.93 (.50–1.7)

1.5 (.89–2.5)

41–50

.78 (.50–1.1)

1.4 (0.9– 2.1)

1.1 (.58–1.9)

1.5 (.93–2.3)

2.0 (1.2–3.3)

1.1 (.58–1.9)

1.1 (.59–2.0)

1.6 (.95–2.7)

>50

.82 (.53–1.3)

2.0 (1.3–3.1)

2.1 (1.1–3.8)

2.2 (1.4–3.5)

2.4 (1.4–4.1)

2.1 (1.1–3.8)

2.3 (1.3–4.1)

2.5 (1.5–4.2)

Knowledge Scores

        

Low*

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Medium

1.4 (1.04 – 1.9)

1.3 (.97–1.9)

1.1 (.68 1.7)

1.7 (.84 1.6)

1.2 (.83 1.8)

1.1 (.68 1.7)

1.7 (1.05–2.7)

1.9 (1.3–3.9)

High

2.0 (1.4–2.8)

2.7 (1.9–3.9)

1.4 (.87–2.2)

1.4 (.97–2.0)

1.4 (.93–2.1)

1.4 (.87–2.2)

2.7 (1.6–4.4)

3.4 (2.2 –5.3)

Clinical Confidence

        

Low

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Medium

1.4 (1.0– 1.9)

1.1 (.76–1.5)

1.2 (.77–1.9)

1.3 (.90–1.8)

1.4 (.97–2.1)

1.2 (.77–1.9)

1.02 (.64–1.6)

1.3 (.88–2.0)

High

1.1 (.76–1.5)

.98 (.69–1.4)

.95 (.59–1.5)

1.2 (.82–1.7)

1.1 (.72–1.6)

.96 (.60–1.6)

1.05 (.66–1.7)

1.4 (.90–2.0)

Extremely high

.96 (.68–1.4)

1.1 (.75–1.6)

1.3 (.80–2.1)

1.0 (.68–1.5)

1.3 (.84–1.9)

1.3 (.80–2.1)

1.2 (.74–1.9)

1.5 (1.0–2.3)

Discuss with patients HDS

        

No *

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Yes

.97 (.73–1.3)

1.34 (1.0–1.8)

1.7 (1.2–2.6)

1.1 (.81–1.5)

1.1 (.78–1.5)

1.7 (1.2–2.6)

1.7 (1.1–2.5)

1.4 (.97–1.9)

*The race/ethnicity variable did not show any positive association for other dietary supplement use in the multivariable analysis.

**The geographic variable showed a positive association (1.6 [1.2–2.2]) for fish oil and 1.3 [1.02 1.7] for multivitamin use in the multivariable analysis.

***Adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (N = 1176)

In adjusted models, the demographic factors most consistently associated with vitamin, mineral and other dietary supplement use were older age and being female. Nurses were more likely to use a multivitamin and students were more likely to use calcium.

In the adjusted model, there was a significant relationship between personal use of supplements (multivitamin, calcium, folate, and fish oil) and knowledge scores. There was a significant relationship between personal use of supplements (vitamin B and D, folate) and discussion with patients about dietary supplements. However, higher use of supplements was not associated with increased levels of confidence in talking with patients about dietary supplements.

Discussion

In our study, supplement use varied by profession with highest rates among nurses, physician assistants and nurse practitioners. Dietary supplement use by the health care professionals in this study is similar to earlier studies of supplement use among dietitians and trainees [2729], but higher than previous reports for pharmacists, physicians, and nurses [3, 20, 3032]. Personal usage by the health care professionals in this study exceeds that of the general public in recent U. S. surveys. Our sample may have included highly motivated HCPs who use more HDS in general and may not be generalizable to the health care community at large[2, 33, 34]. The use of dietary supplements also may have increased in the intervals between these studies and ours. The types of dietary supplements reported as used by these health care professionals are similar to those used by the general public (e.g., multivitamins, calcium, and vitamin E) [2, 35].

As in other studies, our multivariate regression analysis, showed that older age was positively associated with use of calcium, folate, vitamin B, vitamin D, fish oil, and female gender was positively associated with use of calcium, folate, vitamin D, and vitamin B [2, 3]. Unlike earlier studies of the general public, our sample also reported high rates of using fish oil.

Our results are consistent with previous surveys of health care professionals showing a positive association between higher use, greater knowledge and increased communications with patients about dietary supplements [20, 30, 31, 36, 37]. Additional studies are needed to confirm or refute the hypothesis that clinicians with higher knowledge scores who use supplements themselves provide more knowledgeable guidance to patients about them, and to examine the impact of personal health behaviors on the quality of professional care.

After controlling for age and gender, nurses were more likely to use multivitamins and students were more likely to use calcium. More research is necessary to understand the impact of ones professional knowledge, and identity as a health care provider and how it influences health prevention behavior for oneself and one's patients.

Our respondents were self-selected because of their interest about vitamins, minerals and other dietary supplements; and they were also given an extensive list of commonly used supplements that might have enhanced recall and reporting. These two factors may have contributed to the somewhat surprisingly high rates of supplement use reported in this sample compared to earlier studies. Additionally, these results are based on self-report data rather than direct observation or interview which may over or under estimate true use. Data on professional recommendations, prescribing practices, personal use of prescribed and non-prescribed medications, daily doses of dietary supplements, and use of combination products were not collected as part of this study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this large study of diverse health professionals enrolled in an online dietary supplement curriculum confirms earlier studies showing higher use in women and older professionals. However, the results of this study are not generalizable to all health care professionals. Our analysis extends previous research by including a diverse group of health care professionals and by testing the association between personal use of supplements and professionals' knowledge, confidence and self-reported communication practices. It provides a strong basis for future studies to better understand the relationship between professional's use of dietary supplements and their quality of clinical care.

Abbreviations

(HCP): 

health care professionals

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Dr. Gardiner is supported by an NIH Institutional National Research Service Award, Grant No. T32-AT0051 from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) Award K24-AT000589 from NCCAM, National Institutes of Health. Dr. Kemper is supported by NIH grant R01 LM007709 from the NIH National Library of Medicine and by the Fullerton Foundation of Gaffney, South Carolina.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division for Research and Education in Complementary and Integrative Medical Therapies, Harvard Medical School
(2)
Department of Pediatrics and Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Pediatrics, Public Health Sciences and Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
(4)
Division for Research and Education in Complementary and Integrative Medical Therapies, Osher Institute, Harvard Medical School

References

  1. Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL: Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States. Advance Data. 2002, 1-19. 2004 May 27, 343
  2. Millen AE, Dodd KW, Subar AF: Use of vitamin, mineral, nonvitamin, and nonmineral supplements in the United States: The 1992, and 2000 National Health Interview Survey results. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987, 104 (6): 942-950. 10.1016/j.jada.2004.03.022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Frank E, Bendich A, Denniston M: Use of vitamin-mineral supplements by female physicians in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000, 72 (4): 969-975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Towheed TE, Maxwell L, Anastassiades TP, Shea B, Houpt J, Robinson V, Hochberg MC, Wells G: Glucosamine therapy for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005, CD002946-2
  5. Anderson JW, Nicolosi RJ, Borzelleca JF: Glucosamine effects in humans: a review of effects on glucose metabolism, side effects, safety considerations and efficacy. Food Chem Toxicol. 2005, 43 (2): 187-201. 10.1016/j.fct.2004.11.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rosenfeldt F, Hilton D, Pepe S, Krum H: Systematic review of effect of coenzyme Q10 in physical exercise, hypertension and heart failure. Biofactors. 2003, 18 (1–4): 91-100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Harper CR, Jacobson TA: Usefulness of omega-3 fatty acids and the prevention of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2005, 96 (11): 1521-1529. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Amarshi N, Scoggin JA, Ensworth S: Osteoporosis: review of guidelines and consensus statements. Am J Manag Care. 1997, 3 (7): 1077-1084. quiz 1089–1090PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wei GS, Jackson JL, O'Malley PG: Postmenopausal osteoporosis risk management in primary care: how well does it adhere to national practice guidelines?. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2003, 58 (2): 99-104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Compston J: Guidelines for the management of osteoporosis: the present and the future. Osteoporos Int. 2005, 16 (10): 1173-1176. 10.1007/s00198-005-1894-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Clarke BL, Gray TK, Harris DW, Johnston CC, Kleerekoper M, Lindsay R, Luckey MM, McClung MR, Nankin HR, Petak SM, Recker RR, Anderson RJ, Bergman DA, Bloomgarden ZT, Dickey RA, Patumbo PJ, Peters AL, Rettinger HL, Rodbard HW, Rubenstien HA: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2001 edition, with selected updates for 2003. Endocr Pract. 2003, 9 (6): 544-564.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Berg AO: Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs. 2003, 103 (1): 73-80. discussion 81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Whelton PK, He J, Appel LJ, Cultler JA, Havas S, Kotchen TA, Roccella EJ, Stout R, Karimbakas J: Primary prevention of hypertension: clinical and public health advisory from The National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Jama. 2002, 288 (15): 1882-1888. 10.1001/jama.288.15.1882.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Colquhoun D, Ferreira-Jardim A, Eden B: Fish, fish oils and long chain omega 3 fatty acids – cardiac benefit and risk: review by the Nutrition and Metabolism Committee of the National Heart Foundation of Australia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2005, S83-14 Suppl
  15. Harris W: American Heart Association, New guidelines focus on fish, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids. 2005, [http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3006624]Google Scholar
  16. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy Press: Dietary Reference Intakes: Thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, pantothenic acid, biotin, and choline. 1998, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. King J: Dietary guidelines for Americans. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005, 71-Google Scholar
  18. Crandall B: American College of Medical Genetics statement on folic acid: Fortification and supplementation. Am J Med Genet. 1998, 78 (381):
  19. Ayuk-Egbe P, Wutoh AK, Hailemeskel B, Bernard D, Clarke-Tasker V: A survey of nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding herbal therapies. National Academies of Practice Forum: Issues in Interdisciplinary Care (NAPF). 2000, 2 (3): 191-4. (17 ref)Google Scholar
  20. Lindquist R, Tracy MF, Savik K: Personal use of complementary and alternative therapies by critical care nurses. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 2003, 15 (3): 393-9. 10.1016/S0899-5885(02)00104-1. (31 ref)View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Berman BM, Singh BK, Lao L, Singh BB, Ferentz KS, Hartnoll SM: Physicians' attitudes toward complementary or alternative medicine: a regional survey. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995, 8 (5): 361-366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cashman LS, Burns JT, Otieno IM, Fung T: Massachusetts registered dietitians' knowledge, attitudes, opinions, personal use, and recommendations to clients about herbal supplements. J Altern Complement Med. 2003, 9 (5): 735-746. 10.1089/107555303322524580.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Steyn NP, Labadarios D, Nel JH, Heidi-Lee R: Development and validation of a questionnaire to test knowledge and practices of dietitians regarding dietary supplements. Nutrition. 2005, 21 (1): 51-58. 10.1016/j.nut.2004.09.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gardiner P, Ledgeza A, Woods C, Phillips R, Kemper KJ: Herb Use Among Health Care Professionals enrolled in an Online Curriculum on Herbs and Dietary Supplements. JHP. 2006, 6(2),Google Scholar
  25. Kemper KJ, Gardiner P, Gooble J, Mitra A, Woods C: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Four Strategies for Delivering e-Curriculum to Health Care Professionals. BMC Medical Education. 2005Google Scholar
  26. SUDAAN: Professional Software for Survey Data Analysis. Research Triangle Park.
  27. Lee YK, Georgiou C, Raab C: The knowledge, attitudes, and practices of dietitians licensed in Oregon regarding functional foods, nutrient supplements, and herbs as complementary medicine. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000, 100 (5): 543-548. 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00169-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Worthington-Roberts B, Breskin M: Supplementation patterns of Washington State dietitians. J Am Diet Assoc. 1984, 84 (7): 795-800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilkinson JM, Simpson MD: Complementary therapy use by nursing, pharmacy and biomedical science students. Nurs Health Sci. 2001, 3 (1): 19-27. 10.1046/j.1442-2018.2001.00067.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Howard N, Tsourounis C, Kapusnik-Uner J: Dietary supplement survey of pharmacists: personal and professional practices. J Altern Complement Med. 2001, 7 (6): 667-680. 10.1089/10755530152755225.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tracy MF, Lindquist R, Savik K: Use of complementary and alternative therapies: a national survey of critical care nurses. Am J Crit Care. 2005, 14 (5): 404-414. quiz 415–416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Muntwyler J, Hennekens CH, Manson JE, Buring JE, Gaziano JM: Vitamin supplement use in a low-risk population of US male physicians and subsequent cardiovascular mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162 (13): 1472-1476. 10.1001/archinte.162.13.1472. Jul 8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Balluz LS, Kieszak SM, Philen RM, Mulinare J: Vitamin and mineral supplement use in the United States. Results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Fam Med. 2000, 9 (3): 258-262. 10.1001/archfami.9.3.258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moss A: Use of vitamin and mineral supplements in the United States current users, types of products and nutrients. 1989, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
  35. Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Tinker LF, Carter RA, Bolton MP, Agurs-Collins T: Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol. 1999, 9 (3): 178-187. 10.1016/S1047-2797(98)00055-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tracy MF, Lindquist R, Watanuki S: Nurse attitudes towards the use of complementary and alternative therapies in critical care. Heart Lung. 2003, 32 (3): 197-209. 10.1016/S0147-9563(03)00040-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Corbin Winslow L, Shapiro H: Physicians want education about complementary and alternative medicine to enhance communication with their patients. Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162 (10): 1176-1181. 10.1001/archinte.162.10.1176.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/6/21/prepub

Copyright

© Gardiner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement