A systematic review of how homeopathy is represented in conventional and CAM peer reviewed journals
© Caulfield and DeBow; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 15 March 2005
Accepted: 14 June 2005
Published: 14 June 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Mar 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katja Schmidt|
|25 Apr 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matko Marusic|
|7 May 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Timothy Caulfield|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 May 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 May 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matko Marusic|
|25 May 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Timothy Caulfield|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 May 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Jun 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matko Marusic|
|9 Jun 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Timothy Caulfield|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|9 Jun 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Jun 2005||Editorially accepted|
|14 Jun 2005||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-5-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.