Practice patterns of naturopathic physicians: results from a random survey of licensed practitioners in two US States
© Boon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 24 June 2004
Accepted: 20 October 2004
Published: 20 October 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Jun 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Aug 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary Koithan|
|16 Aug 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers|
|10 Sep 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Heather Boon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Sep 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Oct 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Heather Boon|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Oct 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Oct 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Heather Boon|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Oct 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|20 Oct 2004||Editorially accepted|
|20 Oct 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-4-14|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.