Searching biomedical databases on complementary medicine: the use of controlled vocabulary among authors, indexers and investigators
© Murphy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 25 April 2003
Accepted: 07 July 2003
Published: 07 July 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Apr 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 May 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Hersh|
|23 May 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jian Qin|
|12 Jun 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Linda Murphy|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Jun 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jun 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jian Qin|
|29 Jun 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Hersh|
|1 Jul 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Linda Murphy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Jul 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Jul 2003||Editorially accepted|
|7 Jul 2003||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-3-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.