Content validity of manual spinal palpatory exams - A systematic review
© Najm et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 28 February 2003
Accepted: 7 May 2003
Published: 7 May 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Feb 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Mar 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Klaus Linde|
|23 Mar 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde|
|19 Apr 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Wadie Najm|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Apr 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 May 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Wadie Najm|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|2 May 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|7 May 2003||Editorially accepted|
|7 May 2003||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-3-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.