Decrease of a specific biomarker of collagen degradation in osteoarthritis, Coll2-1, by treatment with highly bioavailable curcumin during an exploratory clinical trial

  • Yves Henrotin1, 2Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Myriam Gharbi3,

      Affiliated with

      • Yvan Dierckxsens4,

        Affiliated with

        • Fabian Priem5,

          Affiliated with

          • Marc Marty6,

            Affiliated with

            • Laurence Seidel7,

              Affiliated with

              • Adelin Albert7,

                Affiliated with

                • Elisabeth Heuse8,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Valérie Bonnet8 and

                    Affiliated with

                    • Caroline Castermans8

                      Affiliated with

                      BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201414:159

                      DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-159

                      Received: 5 July 2013

                      Accepted: 30 April 2014

                      Published: 17 May 2014

                      Abstract

                      Background

                      The management of osteoarthritis (OA) remains a challenge. There is a need not only for safe and efficient treatments but also for accurate and reliable biomarkers that would help diagnosis and monitoring both disease activity and treatment efficacy. Curcumin is basically a spice that is known for its anti-inflammatory properties. In vitro studies suggest that curcumin could be beneficial for cartilage in OA. The aim of this exploratory, non-controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of bio-optimized curcumin in knee OA patients on the serum levels of specific biomarkers of OA and on the evaluation of pain.

                      Methods

                      Twenty two patients with knee OA were asked to take 2x3 caps/day of bio-optimized curcumin (Flexofytol®) for 3 months. They were monitored after 7, 14, 28 and 84 days of treatment. Pain over the last 24 hours and global assessment of disease activity by the patient were evaluated using a visual analog scale (100 mm). The serum levels of Coll-2-1, Coll-2-1NO2, Fib3-1, Fib3-2, CRP, CTX-II and MPO were determined before and after 14 and 84 days of treatment.

                      Results

                      The treatment with curcumin was globally well tolerated. It significantly reduced the serum level of Coll2-1 (p < 0.002) and tended to decrease CRP. No other significant difference was observed with the other biomarkers. In addition, curcumin significantly reduced the global assessment of disease activity by the patient.

                      Conclusion

                      This study highlighted the potential effect of curcumin in knee OA patient. This effect was reflected by the variation of a cartilage specific biomarker, Coll2-1 that was rapidly affected by the treatment. These results are encouraging for the qualification of Coll2-1 as a biomarker for the evaluation of curcumin in OA treatment.

                      Trial registration

                      NCT01909037 at clinicaltrials.gov

                      Keywords

                      Osteoarthritis Cartilage Collagen Curcumin Biomarker

                      Background

                      Osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex arthritic condition, evolving over decades and leading to the loss of joint function. It is characterized by the degradation of articular cartilage, the modification of the subchondral bone and the inflammation of the synovial membrane [1]. So far, none of the available treatment allows the control or even better, the arrest of the disease progression. The main recommendations for OA management concentrate on the control of symptoms, i.e. pain and function [26]. This goal is supposed to be achieved mostly by the use of acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, considering the potential side effects and the long duration of treatment, one may prefer the use of less toxic compounds. There is indeed a growing interest for food or food-derived products, the so-called nutraceuticals [79] that provide health and medical benefits with a good safety profile.

                      Curcumin, also known as turmeric, is one candidate as nutraceutical [10, 11]. It is used for centuries by the Ayurvedic and traditional Chinese medicine. Indeed, it has demonstrated astonished properties, mainly anti-inflammatory, against various conditions [1218], including arthritis [10, 1921]. Even if its bioavailability represented a challenge for a long time, several new formulations tend to abrogate this matter [19].

                      In addition to efficient therapies, OA management requires the identification of potent biomarkers for the monitoring of treatment efficacy [22]. Many efforts have been carried out in that direction for the past decade. Collagen degradation products appeared as suitable and reliable biomarkers for OA [23].

                      The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of bio-optimized curcumin during a 90-day period in knee OA patients during an exploratory non-controlled clinical trial. One caps of bio-optimized curcumin contains 42 mg curcumin mixed with polysorbate in a well-defined ratio. The primary endpoint for this study was the measurement of the serum levels of several biomarkers of cartilage metabolism and inflammation and the secondary endpoints were the evaluation of pain and the global patient assessment of disease activity.

                      Methods

                      Patients and treatment

                      This exploratory, non-controlled clinical trial was conducted at the rheumatology center of the Citadelle Hospital of Liège (Belgium) in knee OA patients suffering night pain and effusion registered as NCT01909037 (http://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​show/​NCT01909037). It was approved by the ethic committee of the Citadelle Hospital of Liège (Belgium) (#1209). Patients were selected for their knee OA according to the ACR criteria [24] between March and December 2012. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient enrollment are presented in Table 1. The Kellgren and Lawrence radiographic score of disease severity (K&L) was performed at the time of selection (V1). Patients signed an informed consent before the beginning of the investigation.
                      Table 1

                      Inclusion and exclusion criteria

                       

                      Patients met all the following criteria

                      Inclusion criteria

                      • Men or women, age 45–75;

                      • Medial femoro-tibial gonarthrosis (in case of bilateral OA, the most painful knee was evaluated);

                      • Responding to ACR criteria (clinical evaluation and radiological);

                      • Symptoms lasting for more than 6 months;

                      • Global knee pain evaluation over the last 24 hours > 40 mm (without NSAID or other analgesic for more than 48 hours);

                      • K&L II to III (Kellgren and Lawrence evaluated within the last 12 months);

                      • Agreed to banish NSAIDs and analgesics for the duration of the study;

                      • Signed informed consent;

                      • Capable of following the study guidelines;

                      • With health insurance.

                      Exclusion criteria

                      Patients with AT LEAST ONE of the following criteria were not enrolled in the study

                      • OA disease:

                      o Secondary OA due to metabolic arthropathy: chondrocalcinosis previously

                      o Known or defined by a calcium border on at least one tibiofemoral joint space, gout,…

                      o Predominant symptomatic femoropatellar OA;

                      o Chondromatosis or villo-nodular synovitis of the knee;

                      o Paget’s disease;

                      o Ipsilateral coxarthrosis to the known and symptomatic gonarthrosis;

                      o Recent knee trauma (<1 month) responsible for pain;

                      o Pathologies that could interfere with evaluation (inflammatory and metabolic arthropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, lower limb radiculalgia, arteritis,…).

                      o Joint prosthesis (any site)

                      o Flare affecting another joint

                      • Related to anterior and associated treatments:

                      o Corticosteroid infiltration received to any joint in the month prior enrollment;

                      o Infiltration of hyaluronic acid in the evaluated knee within 6 months before enrollment;

                      o Taking NSAIDs or analgesics in the last 48 hours prior to inclusion;

                      o No changes in their slow-acting anti-OA drugs and anti-OA dietary supplements over the last 6 months (e.g. chondroitin sulfate, diacerein, avocado soybean unsaponifiables, oxaceprol, copper, glucosamine , anti-OA herbal therapy and homeopathy, …);

                      o Taking coumarin anticoagulants and heparins;

                      o General corticosteroid;

                      o Contraindication to paracetamol.

                      • About the product:

                      o Contraindication to the product (Flexofytol)

                      • Related to associated pathologies:

                      o Serious associated diseases (severe liver failure, renal failure, uncontrolled cardiovascular diseases, …).

                      • Regarding the patients:

                      o Pregnant or lactating women;

                      o Premenopausal women not using a contraceptive method;

                      o Patient unable to write;

                      o Patient who participated in a clinical research in the previous 3 months;

                      o Legally responsible adults.

                      Patients enrolled in the study were asked to take bio-optimized curcumin (Flexofytol ®), 3 caps in the morning (on an empty stomach, right before breakfast) and 3 caps in the evening for 3 months. Each caps of bio-optimized curcumin contains 42 mg curcumin mixed with polysorbate (Tween 80®) in a well-defined ratio. The treatment was delivered by the rheumatologist at the time of inclusion. Patients agreed to proscribe analgesics (except acetaminophen, max 4 g/day) or NSAIDs during the study. Acetaminophen was avoided 48 h prior to each visit.

                      The study consisted in a 3-month follow-up with 4 visits (after 7 (V2), 14 (V3), 28 (V4) and 84 (V5) days of treatment). Pain over the last 24 h evaluation and global patient assessment on disease activity were recorded on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) at each visit. At the same time, adverse events and concomitant treatments were also recorded. Blood samples were collected at the time of V1, V3 and V5. All assessments and data collection were performed by the rheumatologist. No incentive to increase compliance or adherence was proposed to the patients.

                      Serum biomarkers

                      Biological assays using specific kits were performed by Artialis S.A. (Liège, Belgium) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Coll-2-1 (nmol/L), Coll-2-1NO2 (nmol/L), Fib3-1 (pmol/L), Fib3-2 (pmol/L), C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L), CTX-II (ng/L) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) (μg/L) were measured in the serum of OA patients.

                      The concentration of Coll2-1 and Coll2-1NO2 were measured by two new competitive and specific immunoassays (ELISA) [25]. The Coll2-1 immunoassay only measured the amino acid sequence 108HRGYPGLDG116 in its linear form while the Coll2-1NO2 immunoassay quantified with a high specificity and affinity the nitrated amino acids sequence. The limits of detection were 17 nM for Coll2-1 immunoassay and 25 pM for Coll2-1NO2 immunoassay. The intra- and inter-assay CVs were lower than 10% and the dilution curves were parallel to the standard curve for both assays. The analytical recoveries were in mean 104.7% and 121.9% for Coll2-1 and Coll2-1NO2 assays, respectively.

                      Fib3-1 (TCQDINECETTNECR) and Fib3-2 (CVCPVSNAMCR) are specific peptides of fibulin-3 that are potential biomarkers of osteoarthritis [26]. The immunoassays for measuring Fib3-1 or Fib3-2 have been developed using polyclonal antibodies which did not recognize complete fibulin-3 and did not cross-react between Fib3-1 and Fib3-2. The lower detection limit of the Fib3-1 assay was 5.2 pM. The within-run (intra-assay) precisions and the between-run (inter-assay) precision were below 11%. Linearity was shown by diluting samples serially and comparing the observed values with those expected. Typical recovery rate of 85.8-104% was noted in a range of dilution between 2 and 8 fold. Spiking recovery, determined by the addition of known quantities of Fib3-1 peptide (from 25 to 250 pM) into sample ranged from 92.3% to 103.2%. The lower detection limit of the Fib3-2 assay was 8 pM. The CVs of intra-assays and inter-assays were below 11%. The dilution curves were parallel to the standard curve with a typical recovery rate of 80.49-105.13% in a range of dilution between two and eight- fold. The recovery of spiking was between 101.3% and 112.4%. Serum samples were twice-diluted in standard buffer.

                      Myeloperoxidase (MPO) was determined by a commercially available ELISA kit (ELIZEN MPO, Zentech SA, Liège, Belgium).

                      High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) values were determined by a highly sensitive immunonephelometric method (DADE Behring, Milan, Italy) on a BN II Analyzer. The lower limit of detection was 0.175 mg/l (analytical sensitivity 0.04 mg/l).

                      Urinary C-Terminal telopeptides of type II Collagen (U-CTX-II) was assayed with a competitive ELISA based on a monoclonal antibody raised against the EKGPDP linear six-amino acid epitope of the type II collagen C telopeptide (CartiLaps®, Nordic Biosciences, Herlev, Denmark) [27].

                      Statistical analysis

                      The results are expressed as mean, standard deviation (SD) and range for quantitative variables and as frequency tables (numbers and percent) for categorized variables. A log-transform was applied to data in case of non-normality. The evolution of pain assessment, judgment against the disease and biomarkers with time was analyzed using a Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM). This model takes into account that time-related measurements within patients. Calculations were made on the maximum data available. The results were considered significant at 5% significance level (p <0.05). The calculations were performed using the SAS (version 9.3 for Windows).

                      Results

                      Patients and safety

                      Twenty two patients (7 males (31.8%) and 15 females (68.2%)) were included in the study. They were 64.3 ± 8.39 years old (ranging 49 to 77). Patients’ disease history is summarized in Table 2. They all have pain for years. K&L radiographic severity score was mostly II (50.0%) and III (31.8%) revealing moderate to severe OA. Among the recruited patients, 59.1% of patients suffered night pain and 31.8% have knee effusion, reflecting the inflammatory status of the disease.
                      Table 2

                      Demographic data and OA history

                      Patients

                       

                      N

                      22 (M: 7-F: 15)

                      Age

                      64.3 ± 8.4 years

                      Pain history

                      48.5 ± 48.2 months

                      Knee pain

                       

                      - Left

                      4.6%

                      - Right

                      31.8%

                      - Both

                      63.6%

                      Radiographic knee OA severity score (K&L)

                       

                      - I

                      13.6%

                      - II

                      50.0%

                      - III

                      31.8%

                      - IV

                      4.6%

                      Night pain

                       

                        -Yes

                      59.1%

                        -No

                      40.9%

                      Effusion

                       

                        -Yes

                      31.8%

                        -No

                      68.2%

                      Among the 22 patients recruited in the study, 20 completed the study. One patient discontinued the study after V3 (after14 days of treatment) due to diarrhea and vomiting and another one after V4 (after 28 days of treatment) due to nausea and vomiting. The safety, adverse events and drop out are presented Table 3. A good observance of the treatment was recorded throughout the study. The observed adverse events were minor and related to gastro-intestinal problems.
                      Table 3

                      Summary of the visits

                       

                      Patients

                      Blood collection

                      Adverse events

                      Concomitant treatment

                      Drop off

                      V1

                      22

                      22

                      -

                      -

                      -

                      V2

                      22

                       

                      9.1%

                      50.0%

                       

                      (7 days)

                      V3

                      22

                      22

                      14.3%

                      45.4%

                      1

                      (14 days)

                      V4

                      21

                       

                      14.3%

                      35.0%

                      1

                      (28 days)

                      V5

                      (84 days)

                      20

                      20

                      25%

                      55.6%

                       

                      V1: first visit, at the time of selection; V2: visit after 7 days of treatment ; V3: visit after 14 days of treatment; V4: visit after 28 days of treatment; V5: visit after 84 days of treatment.

                      Knee OA patients with night pain and effusion were asked to take 2x3 caps of an enriched curcumin extract twice a day for 3 months from V1. They were visited after 7, 14, 28 and 84 days of treatment.

                      Primary endpoint: serum levels of biomarkers

                      Several biomarkers were measured in the serum of patients during the study (Table 4). The intake of curcumin induced a significant and systematic reduction of Coll2-1 (P = 0.002 between V1 and V5). A decrease of serum Coll2-1 level was recorded in all patients. Otherwise no significant effect was observed on the other tested biomarkers. However, there was a 77% decrease of CRP in the serum of patients taking curcumin for 3 months, but this effect was not significant most probably due to wide variability of the CRP levels at baseline.
                      Table 4

                      Primary endpoint-Serum biomarkers levels

                       

                      Coll2-1 (nmol/L)

                      Coll2-1NO2 (nmol/L)

                      Fib3-1 (pmol/L)

                      Fib3-2 (pmol/L)

                      CRP (mg/L)

                      Cartilaps (ng/L)

                      MPO (μg/L)

                      V1

                      302.21 ± 53.78

                      0.71 ± 0.18

                      707.05 ± 178.79

                      580.58 ± 103.09

                      10.42 ± 30.27

                      11.81 ± 7.98

                      27.20 ± 29.05

                      V3

                      315.37 ± 62.35

                      0.77 ± 0.20

                      736.05 ± 157.16

                      600.90 ± 86.04

                      3.82 ± 3.29

                      12.12 ± 5.98

                      20.46 ± 13.15

                      V5

                      257.84 ± 52.78

                      0.80 ± 0.24

                      765.20 ± 261.90

                      636.74 ± 119.73

                      3.10 ± 2.40

                      13.17 ± 4.96

                      21.96 ± 14.65

                      P = 0.002*

                      *p value versus V1. Data are mean ± sd and were analyzed with Student t-test. V1: first visit, at the time of selection; V3: visit after 14 days of treatment; V5: visit after 84 days of treatment.

                      Secondary endpoints: pain over the last 24 hours and global assessment of disease activity

                      The mean values obtained for the secondary endpoints are reported Table 5. The pain over the last 24 hours evaluated on a VAS (100 mm) tended to decrease (by 22% in mean) under treatment with curcumin. However, this reduction was not significant most probably due to wide variability of response. Nevertheless, a significant lessening of the global assessment of disease activity by the patients was observed between V1 and V5 (P = 0.0047).
                      Table 5

                      Secondary endpoints - pain over the last 24 hours and global patient assessment on disease activity evaluated at each visit on a VAS (100 mm)

                       

                      N

                      Pain (VAS)

                      P value

                      Disease activity

                      P value

                      V1

                      22

                      49.41 ± 24.94

                      ns

                      60.00 ± 22.67

                      ns

                      V2

                      22

                      50.95 ± 23.85

                      ns

                      58.32 ± 20.37

                      ns

                      V3

                      21

                      44.52 ± 27.41

                      ns

                      48.71 ± 27.37

                      ns

                      V4

                      20

                      42.20 ± 26.33

                      ns

                      42.70 ± 25.82

                      ns

                      V5

                      20

                      39.20 ± 28.96

                      ns

                      38.85 ± 27.66

                      0.0047*

                      *p value versus V1. Data are mean ± sd and were analyzed with Student t-test. V1: first visit, at the time of selection; V2: visit after 7 days of treatment; V3: visit after 14 days of treatment; V4: visit after 28 days of treatment; V5: visit after 84 days of treatment.

                      Discussion

                      This study showed that bio-optimized curcumin was associated with a decrease of the level of a specific biomarker of OA and improving of the global assessment of the disease by the patient. In addition, the treatment was globally well tolerated with a low drop-out rate, minor adverse effects (mainly nausea) and a good observance. This bio-optimized curcumin is an enriched formulation of curcumin (42 mg/caps) with an enhanced bioavailability that might be responsible at least in part for this effect. Indeed, at the dose use in this study, the bio-optimized curcumin has a Cmax statistically extrapolated around 2 μM, which is the concentration that produced significant effect in vitro [19]. The used dose has been determined after a phase I pharmacokinetic study on Flexofytol®. In this trial 2 groups of 12 healthy individuals received orally 1 (42 mg curcumin) or 2 capsules (84 mg of curcumin) of Arantal® respectively. With 2 capsules administered orally, the mean of Cmax on 12 individuals was 0.9 μM, with a statistical extrapolation at 1.6 μM with 4 capsules (84 mg and 168 mg of curcumin respectively) [19]. In vitro, curcumin significantly inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostanoids, and matrix-metalloproteases by chondrocytes [10, 28]. Moreover, it is also able to promote chondrogenesis [29] and to block tumor necrosis factor (TNF) action and production both in vitro and in vivo [30].

                      Coll2-1 and its nitrated form, Coll2-1 NO2, are specific biomarkers of OA. They have been tested in animals [3134] and humans [3539]. Coll2-1 is the only one biomarker that was affected by the treatment with curcumin in this study. Coll2-1 is a peptide of type II collagen molecule detected after collagen triple helix unwounding and digestion by gelatinases. This finding suggests that bio-optimized curcumin could reduce cartilage matrix degradation. This hypothesis is supported by the in vitro observation showing that curcumin inhibits MMP-9 production by chondrocytes [40].

                      In addition, Coll2-1 decrease is concomitant with an improvement of the global assessment of disease activity by the patients. This property of the bio-optimized curcumin is of major importance when considering the inflammatory status of the disease and its importance in the disease process [41, 42].

                      These significant results are accompanied by less marked variations. Indeed, the pain over the last 24-hours estimated at each visit and the serum level of CRP decrease over the study duration. However, most probably due to the wide variety of response, they didn’t come out significant. Nevertheless, they both document the potential effect of bio-optimized curcumin in knee OA patient at reducing pain and are in favor of its anti-inflammatory effect.

                      Patients were asked to take curcumin for 3 months and the follow-up didn’t go further. The short duration of the follow-up might explain the lack of significance of some of the results. A longer survey may have revealed stronger potencies of curcumin.

                      Of course this study is exploratory and suffers of some limitations including the small sample size and the absence of control group. However, this study has allowed the identification of a biochemical marker which is sensitive to curcumin. This marker will be helpful for phase II and III clinical trials to monitor drug efficacy. It could also serve as marker to follow the efficacy of bio-optimized curcumin in the daily practice. In addition, this pilot study shows for the first time that orally administrated curcumin is active in OA and suggests that this compound positively modulate the metabolism of cartilage. This is a positive signal to follow the development of this compound for the management of OA disease.

                      Conclusion

                      In conclusion, the use of curcumin under improved formulation in knee OA patients appears as a good complement to classical treatments. The precise mechanism of action should be documented in OA patient. This study highlighted the importance of relevant and accurate biomarkers to monitor disease activity and to evaluate the efficacy of a treatment. These results are encouraging for the validation of Coll2-1 as a biomarker for the evaluation of a treatment for OA.

                      Abbreviations

                      CRP: 

                      C-reactive protein

                      CTX: 

                      C-telopeptide of type II collagen

                      Fib: 

                      Fibulin

                      K&L: 

                      Kellgren and Lawrence

                      MPO: 

                      myeloperoxidase

                      NSAID: 

                      non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

                      OA: 

                      osteoarthritis

                      SD: 

                      standard deviation

                      TNF: 

                      tumor necrosis factor

                      V: 

                      visit

                      VAS: 

                      visual analog scale.

                      Declarations

                      Acknowledgements

                      This study was financed by Tilman S.A. and BioXtract S.A. The authors thank Pr Thierry Appelboom for his collaboration and Dr Christelle Boileau for her assistance in this manuscript preparation.

                      Authors’ Affiliations

                      (1)
                      Bone and Cartilage Research Unit, Institute of Pathology, University of Liège
                      (2)
                      Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Princess Paola Hospital
                      (3)
                      Artialis S.A, CIGA tower
                      (4)
                      Tilman S.A., ZI Sud
                      (5)
                      Bioxtract S.A., Parc Scientifique Créalys
                      (6)
                      Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Henri Mondor
                      (7)
                      Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics
                      (8)
                      Department of Rheumatology, CHR La Citadelle

                      References

                      1. Samuels J, Krasnokutsky S, Abramson SB: Osteoarthritis: a tale of three tissues. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2008, 66:244–250.PubMed
                      2. Zhang W, Doherty M, Arden N, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma J, Gunther KP, Hauselmann HJ, Herrero-Beaumont G, Jordan K, Kaklamanis P, Leeb B, Lequesne M, Lohmander S, Mazieres B, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Pendleton A, Punzi L, Swoboda B, Varatojo R, Verbruggen G, Zimmermann-Gorska I, Dougados M: EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64:669–681.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      3. Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:137–162.PubMedView Article
                      4. Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:981–1000.PubMedView Article
                      5. Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz RW, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden NK, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: Changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010, 18:476–499.PubMedView Article
                      6. Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma JW, Dieppe P, Gunther K, Hauselmann H, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kaklamanis P, Lohmander S, Leeb B, Lequesne M, Mazieres B, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Pendleton A, Punzi L, Serni U, Swoboda B, Verbruggen G, Zimmerman-Gorska I, Dougados M: EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2003, 62:1145–1155.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      7. Ameye LG, Chee WS: Osteoarthritis and nutrition: from nutraceuticals to functional foods: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Arthritis Res Ther 2006, 8:R127.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      8. Henrotin Y, Lambert C, Couchourel D, Ripoll C, Chiotelli E: Nutraceuticals: do they represent a new era in the management of osteoarthritis? - a narrative review from the lessons taken with five products. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:1–21.PubMedView Article
                      9. Kalra EK: Nutraceutical–definition and introduction. AAPS PharmSci 2003, 5:E25.PubMedView Article
                      10. Henrotin Y, Clutterbuck AL, Allaway D, Lodwig EM, Harris P, Mathy-Hartert M, Shakibaei M, Mobasheri A: Biological actions of curcumin on articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010, 18:141–149.PubMedView Article
                      11. Shen L, Ji HF: The pharmacology of curcumin: is it the degradation products? Trends Mol Med 2012, 18:138–144.PubMedView Article
                      12. Goel A, Aggarwal BB: Curcumin, the golden spice from Indian saffron, is a chemosensitizer and radiosensitizer for tumors and chemoprotector and radioprotector for normal organs. Nutr Cancer 2010, 62:919–930.PubMedView Article
                      13. Goel A, Jhurani S, Aggarwal BB: Multi-targeted therapy by curcumin: how spicy is it? Mol Nutr Food Res 2008, 52:1010–1030.PubMedView Article
                      14. Goel A, Kunnumakkara AB, Aggarwal BB: Curcumin as “Curecumin”: from kitchen to clinic. Biochem Pharmacol 2008, 75:787–809.PubMedView Article
                      15. Aggarwal BB: Targeting inflammation-induced obesity and metabolic diseases by curcumin and other nutraceuticals. Annu Rev Nutr 2010, 30:173–199.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      16. Aggarwal BB, Harikumar KB: Potential therapeutic effects of curcumin, the anti-inflammatory agent, against neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, autoimmune and neoplastic diseases. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009, 41:40–59.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      17. Aggarwal BB, Sung B: Pharmacological basis for the role of curcumin in chronic diseases: an age-old spice with modern targets. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2009, 30:85–94.PubMedView Article
                      18. Basnet P, Skalko-Basnet N: Curcumin: an anti-inflammatory molecule from a curry spice on the path to cancer treatment. Molecules 2011, 16:4567–4598.PubMedView Article
                      19. Henrotin Y, Priem F, Mobasheri A: Curcumin: a new paradigm and therapeutic opportunity for the treatment of osteoarthritis: curcumin for osteoarthritis management. Springerplus 2013, 2:56.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      20. Chandran B, Goel A: A randomized, pilot study to assess the efficacy and safety of curcumin in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Phytother Res 2012,26(11):1719–1725.PubMedView Article
                      21. Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, Dugall M, Pellegrini L, Ledda A, Grossi MG, Togni S, Appendino G: Efficacy and safety of Meriva(R), a curcumin-phosphatidylcholine complex, during extended administration in osteoarthritis patients. Altern Med Rev 2010, 15:337–344.PubMed
                      22. Kraus VB, Burnett B, Coindreau J, Cottrell S, Eyre D, Gendreau M, Gardiner J, Garnero P, Hardin J, Henrotin Y, Heinegard D, Ko A, Lohmander LS, Matthews G, Menetski J, Moskowitz R, Persiani S, Poole AR, Rousseau JC, Todman M: Application of biomarkers in the development of drugs intended for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:515–542.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      23. Henrotin Y, Addison S, Kraus V, Deberg M: Type II collagen markers in osteoarthritis: what do they indicate? Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007, 19:444–450.PubMedView Article
                      24. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M: Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee: diagnostic and therapeutic criteria committee of the american rheumatism association. Arthritis Rheum 1986, 29:1039–1049.PubMedView Article
                      25. Henrotin Y, Deberg M, Dubuc JE, Quettier E, Christgau S, Reginster JY: Type II collagen peptides for measuring cartilage degradation. Biorheology 2004, 41:543–547.PubMed
                      26. Henrotin Y, Gharbi M, Mazzucchelli G, Dubuc JE, De Pauw E, Deberg M: Fibulin 3 peptides Fib3–1 and Fib3–2 are potential biomarkers of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2012, 64:2260–2267.PubMedView Article
                      27. Christgau S, Henrotin Y, Tanko LB, Rovati LC, Collette J, Bruyere O, Deroisy R, Reginster JY: Osteoarthritic patients with high cartilage turnover show increased responsiveness to the cartilage protecting effects of glucosamine sulphate. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2004, 22:36–42.PubMed
                      28. Clutterbuck AL, Allaway D, Harris P, Mobasheri A: Curcumin reduces prostaglandin E2, matrix metalloproteinase-3 and proteoglycan release in the secretome of interleukin 1beta-treated articular cartilage. F1000Res 2013, 2:147.PubMed CentralPubMed
                      29. Buhrmann C, Mobasheri A, Matis U, Shakibaei M: Curcumin mediated suppression of nuclear factor-kappaB promotes chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in a high-density co-culture microenvironment. Arthritis Res Ther 2010, 12:R127.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      30. Aggarwal BB, Gupta SC, Sung B: Curcumin: an orally bioavailable blocker of TNF and other pro-inflammatory biomarkers. Br J Pharmacol 2013, 169:1672–1692.PubMedView Article
                      31. Ameye LG, Deberg M, Oliveira M, Labasse A, Aeschlimann JM, Henrotin Y: The chemical biomarkers C2C, Coll2–1, and Coll2–1NO2 provide complementary information on type II collagen catabolism in healthy and osteoarthritic mice. Arthritis Rheum 2007, 56:3336–3346.PubMedView Article
                      32. Henrotin Y, Martel-Pelletier J, Msika P, Guillou GB, Deberg M: Usefulness of specific OA biomarkers, Coll2–1 and Coll2–1NO2, in the anterior cruciate ligament OA canine model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012, 20:787–790.PubMedView Article
                      33. Huebner JL, Williams JM, Deberg M, Henrotin Y, Kraus VB: Collagen fibril disruption occurs early in primary guinea pig knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010, 18:397–405.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      34. Verwilghen DR, Martens A, Busschers E, Franck T, Deberg M, Henrotin Y, Vanderheyden L, Serteyn D: Coll2–1, Coll2–1NO2 and myeloperoxidase concentrations in the synovial fluid of equine tarsocrural joints affected with osteochondrosis. Vet Res Commun 2011, 35:401–408.PubMedView Article
                      35. Deberg M, Dubuc JE, Labasse A, Sanchez C, Quettier E, Bosseloir A, Crielaard JM, Henrotin Y: One-year follow-up of Coll2–1, Coll2–1NO2 and myeloperoxydase serum levels in osteoarthritis patients after hip or knee replacement. Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67:168–174.PubMedView Article
                      36. Deberg M, Labasse A, Christgau S, Cloos P, Bang Henriksen D, Chapelle JP, Zegels B, Reginster JY, Henrotin Y: New serum biochemical markers (Coll 2–1 and Coll 2–1 NO2) for studying oxidative-related type II collagen network degradation in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 13:258–265.PubMedView Article
                      37. Henrotin Y, Chevalier X, Deberg M, Balblanc JC, Richette P, Mulleman D, Maillet B, Rannou F, Piroth C, Mathieu P, Rannou F, Conrozier T: Early decrease of serum biomarkers of type II collagen degradation (Coll2–1) and joint inflammation (Coll2–1 NO2) by hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A research study part of the Biovisco study. J Orthop Res 2013, 31:901–907.PubMedView Article
                      38. Henrotin Y, Labasse A, Franck T, Bosseloir A, Bury T, Deberg M: Collagen catabolism through Coll2–1 and Coll2–1NO and myeloperoxidase activity in marathon runners. Springerplus 2013, 2:92.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      39. Punzi L, Ramonda R, Deberg M, Frallonardo P, Campana C, Musacchio E, Henrotin Y: Coll2–1, Coll2–1NO2 and myeloperoxidase serum levels in erosive and non-erosive osteoarthritis of the hands. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012, 20:557–561.PubMedView Article
                      40. Shakibaei M, John T, Schulze-Tanzil G, Lehmann I, Mobasheri A: Suppression of NF-kappaB activation by curcumin leads to inhibition of expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in human articular chondrocytes: Implications for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Biochem Pharmacol 2007, 73:1434–1445.PubMedView Article
                      41. Ayral X, Pickering EH, Woodworth TG, Mackillop N, Dougados M: Synovitis: a potential predictive factor of structural progression of medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis – results of a 1 year longitudinal arthroscopic study in 422 patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 13:361–367.PubMedView Article
                      42. Roemer FW, Guermazi A, Felson DT, Niu J, Nevitt MC, Crema MD, Lynch JA, Lewis CE, Torner J, Zhang Y: Presence of MRI-detected joint effusion and synovitis increases the risk of cartilage loss in knees without osteoarthritis at 30-month follow-up: the MOST study. Ann Rheum Dis 2011, 70:1804–1809.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
                      43. Pre-publication history

                        1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1472-6882/​14/​159/​prepub

                      Copyright

                      © Henrotin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                      This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.