Patient outcomes and experiences of an acupuncture and self-care service for persistent low back pain in the NHS: a mixed methods approach
© Cheshire et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 February 2013
Accepted: 14 October 2013
Published: 1 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Feb 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Cheshire|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lesley Wye|
|4 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pilar Escolar-Reina|
|3 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Cheshire|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lesley Wye|
|20 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pilar Escolar-Reina|
|1 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Cheshire|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|1 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-13-300|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.