Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The antiproliferative effect of Moringa oleifera crude aqueous leaf extract on cancerous human alveolar epithelial cells

  • Charlette Tiloke2,
  • Alisa Phulukdaree2 and
  • Anil A Chuturgoon1Email author
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201313:226

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-226

Received: 23 January 2013

Accepted: 9 September 2013

Published: 16 September 2013



The incidence of lung cancer is expected to increase due to increases in exposure to airborne pollutants and cigarette smoke. Moringa oleifera (MO), a medicinal plant found mainly in Asia and South Africa is used in the traditional treatment of various ailments including cancer. This study investigated the antiproliferative effect of MO leaf extract (MOE) in cancerous A549 lung cells.


A crude aqueous leaf extract was prepared and the cells were treated with 166.7 μg/ml MOE (IC50) for 24 h and assayed for oxidative stress (TBARS and Glutathione assays), DNA fragmentation (comet assay) and caspase (3/7 and 9) activity. In addition, the expression of Nrf2, p53, Smac/DIABLO and PARP-1 was determined by Western blotting. The mRNA expression of Nrf2 and p53 was assessed using qPCR.


A significant increase in reactive oxygen species with a concomitant decrease in intracellular glutathione levels (p < 0.001) in MOE treated A549 cells was observed. MOE showed a significant reduction in Nrf2 protein expression (1.89-fold, p < 0.05) and mRNA expression (1.44-fold). A higher level of DNA fragmentation (p < 0.0001) was seen in the MOE treated cells. MOE’s pro-apoptotic action was confirmed by the significant increase in p53 protein expression (1.02-fold, p < 0.05), p53 mRNA expression (1.59-fold), caspase-9 (1.28-fold, p < 0.05), caspase-3/7 (1.52-fold) activities and an enhanced expression of Smac/DIABLO. MOE also caused the cleavage and activation of PARP-1 into 89 KDa and 24 KDa fragments (p < 0.0001).


MOE exerts antiproliferative effects in A549 lung cells by increasing oxidative stress, DNA fragmentation and inducing apoptosis.


Moringa oleifera Drumstick tree Lung cancer Oxidative stress Nrf2 Apoptosis


Lung cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in many countries [1]. Inhalation of airborne pollutants, exposure to toxins present in grain dusts and fungal spores and cigarette smoking causes lung damage and increases the risk of carcinogenesis [2]. South Africa (SA) has the highest human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection burden globally and Bello et al. (2011) showed that surviving HIV positive individuals have a high risk of cancer such as lung cancer. Cancer deaths accounted for 63% in developing countries across the world [3]. Cancer is characterised by uncontrolled cell growth as cells proliferate and evade apoptosis [4]. Apoptosis is regulated by caspases through two pathways, viz., death receptor-mediated procaspase-activation pathway (extrinsic pathway) and mitochondrion-mediated procaspase-activation pathway (intrinsic pathway) [4, 5]. To maintain cellular homeostasis, these cells follow a process of growth, division and cell death. When this process is affected, it can result in the initiation of cancer.

There are many regulators of apoptosis. The p53 tumor suppressor protein and transcription factor is up-regulated when DNA is damaged by causing G1 arrest and DNA repair; if the repair is unsuccessful then it signals for apoptosis and ultimately cell death [6, 7]. During apoptosis cellular proteins are proteolysed by caspases. These proteins also include poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) [8].

Lung cancer still remains incurable and current drug therapies have many side-effects and alternate therapy is actively being sought [9]. If traditional medicine can provide an alternate source for treatment, the number of lung cancer deaths can be reduced. Some traditional medicines possess antiproliferative effects such as Sutherlandia frutescens, commonly referred to as cancer bush, is used by traditional healers in SA to treat cancer [10]. Moringa oleifera (MO), an indigenous tree to India, is found widely in SA [11]. It belongs to the family Moringaceae and is cultivated for medicinal and industrial purposes [12]. It is commonly referred to as the ‘tree of life’ or Drumstick tree [12, 13]. All parts of the MO plant possess medicinal properties, but the leaves have high nutritional value (high levels of vitamins C and A, potassium, proteins, calcium and iron) [14, 15]. In addition the leaves possess phytochemicals like carotenoids, alkaloids and flavonoids [11] and is rich in amino acids such as cystine, lysine, methionine and tryptophan [16]. MO is used in traditional treatment of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular and liver disease.

Phytochemical properties of MO play an important role in its mode of action against diseases [11]. It contains a rich source of rhamnose, glucosinolates and isothiocyanates. A study conducted by Manguro and Lemmen (2007) into the phenolics of MOE had characterised five flavonol glycosides using spectroscopic methods [17]. The anticancer property can be attributed to specific components of MOE such as 4-(α-L-rhamnopyranosyloxy) benzyl glucosinolate, 4-(α-L-rhamnopyranosyloxy) benzyl isothiocyanate, benzyl isothiocyanate and niazimicin. The leaves contain quercetin-3-O-glucoside and kaempferol-3-O-glucoside which plays a role in antioxidant defence as it scavengers for free radicals thus reducing oxidative stress [12]. Thiocarbamates such as niazimicin are found in the leaves and can be used as a chemopreventive agent [18, 19]. Studies have suggested that the anticancer and chemopreventive property of MOE can be attributed to niazimicin [20, 21].

MO leaf extracts have been shown to disrupt proliferation of cancer cells. In a study on Swiss mice, MO leaf extracts increased glutathione-S-transferase (GST) [12]. The MO leaf extracts induced apoptosis in KB carcinoma cells [22]. Sreelatha and Padma (2011) had shown that the extracts inhibited lipid peroxidation as it scavenged free radicals and reduced oxidative stress [22]. It also protected against oxidative DNA damage. To date there is no study assessing the effects of MO leaf extracts on lung carcinogenesis. The present study investigated the antiproliferative effects of a crude aqueous extract of MO leaves in A549 (human lung carcinoma) cells. It was hypothesised that MO leaf extracts induces cell death as a result of oxidative stress in the cancerous cells.



MO leaves were collected from the KwaZulu-Natal region (Durban, South Africa) and verified by the KwaZulu-Natal herbarium (Batch no. CT/1/2012, Genus no. 3128). A549 cells were purchased from Highveld Biologicals (Johannesburg, South Africa). Cell culture reagents were purchased from Whitehead Scientific (Johannesburg, South Africa). ECL-LumiGlo® chemiluminescent substrate kit was purchased from Gaithersburg (USA) and western blot reagents were purchased from Bio-Rad (USA). All other reagents were purchased from Merck (South Africa).

Cell culture

A549 lung cells were cultured (37°C, 5% CO2) in 25 cm3 culture flasks in complete culture media (CCM) [23] comprising of Eagle’s minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum, 1% L-glutamine and 1% penicillin-streptomycin-fungizone until confluent [24]. Cell growth was monitored and CCM was changed as necessary. Confluent flasks were trypsinized using 1 ml trypsin. Cell numbers were enumerated using trypan blue.

Leaf extract

The MO leaf extract (MOE) was prepared by crushing 10 g of air-dried leaves in a pestle and mortar and the subsequent addition of 100 ml de-ionised water [24, 25]. The resultant extract was boiled with continuous stirring for 20 min, transferred to 50 ml conical tubes and centrifuged [720 × g, 10 min, room temperature (RT)]. The upper aqueous layer (MOE) was removed, lyophilised and stored at 4°C. MOE stock solution was prepared by dissolving 1 mg of MOE in 1 ml of CCM and filter sterilised [0.22 μM filter (Millipore)].

Cell viability assay

The cytotoxicity of MOE in A549 cells was determined using the Methyl thiazol tetrazolium (MTT) assay [26]. A549 cells (15,000 cells/well) were seeded into a 96-well microtitre plate. The cells were incubated with varying MOE dilutions (0, 1, 10, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 500 μg/ml) in six replicates (300 μl/well) and incubated (37°C, 5% CO2) for 24 h. A control of cells incubated with CCM only was used. A CCM/MTT salt solution (5 mg/ml) was added (120 μl/well) and the plate was incubated (37°C, 4 h). Thereafter, supernatants were removed; dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) 100 μl/well was added and incubated (1 h). The optical density of the formazan product was measured at 570 nm and reference wavelength of 690 nm using a spectrophotometer (Bio Tek μQuant). The percentage cell viability was determined and a concentration-response curve was plotted using GraphPad Prism V5.0 software relative to the control. This experiment was repeated on two separate occasions before the concentration of half the maximum inhibition (IC50) was calculated.

For subsequent assays, A549 cells at inoculation density of 20,000 cells per well were treated (24 h) with the IC50 determined on viability assay.

Lipid peroxidation - quantification of malondialdehyde (MDA)

To investigate MOE generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), Thiobarbituric acid assay (TBARS) was used. TBARS measures MDA which is the end product of lipid peroxidation and an indicator of oxidative stress [27]. Following treatment, cells lysed in 0.2% H3PO4 (100 μl) by passing the cell solution through a 25 gauge needle at least 25 times from each sample was transferred to test tubes with the addition of 2% H3PO4 (200 μl), 7% H3PO4 (400 μl) and TBA/BHT solution (400 μl). A positive control of MDA and a negative control of CCM were prepared. All samples were adjusted to pH 1.5 and heated (100°C, 15 min). After cooling, butanol (1.5 ml) was added to each test tube, vortexed and allowed to separate into distinct phases. The upper butanol phase (800 μl) was transferred into eppendorfs and centrifuged (17,949 × g, 6 min, RT). 100 μl from each sample was aliquoted into a 96-well microtitre plate in six replicates. The optical density was measured on a spectrophotometer at 532 nm with reference wavelength of 600 nm. The mean optical density for each sample was calculated and divided by the absorption coefficient (156 mM-1). The results were expressed in μM.

Antioxidant potential - quantification of glutathione

Glutathione-Glo™ Assay (Promega) was used according to manufacturer’s guidelines to quantify glutathione (GSH) levels. 50 μl from each sample (MOE treated and untreated control) was added in six replicates to the wells of an opaque polystyrene 96-well microtitre plate. GSH standards (0-50 μM) were prepared from a 5 mM stock diluted in de-ionised water. 50 μl of each GSH standards and 50 μl of the GSH-Glo™ Reagent 2× was added per well and incubated in the dark (30 min, RT). Reconstituted Luciferin Detection Reagent (50 μl) was added per well and incubated (15 min, RT). The luminescence was measured on a Modulus™ microplate luminometer (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, USA). The data was analysed and expressed as relative light units (RLU).

DNA damage

DNA damage was determined using the Comet assay [28]. Following treatment of cells (20,000 cells/well) in a 6-well plate, supernatants were removed and cells were trypsinized. Three slides per sample were prepared as the first layer of 1% low melting point agarose (LMPA, 37°C), second layer of 25 μl of cells (20, 000) from the samples with 175 μl of 0.5% LMPA (37°C) and third layer of 0.5% LMPA (37°C) covered the slides. After solidification, the slides were then submerged in cold lysing solution [2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris (pH 10), 10% DMSO] and incubated (4°C, 1 h). Following incubation the slides were placed in electrophoresis buffer [300 mM NaOH, 1 mM Na2EDTA (pH 13)] for 20 min and thereafter subjected to electrophoresis (25 V, 35 min, RT) using Bio-Rad compact power supply. The slides were then washed 3 times with neutralisation buffer [0.4 M Tris (pH 7.4)] for 5 min each. The slides were stained overnight (4°C) with 40 μl ethidium bromide (EtBr) and viewed with a fluorescent microscope (Olympus IXSI inverted microscope with 510-560 nm excitation and 590 nm emission filters). Images of 50 cells and comets were captured per treatment and the comet tail lengths were measured using Soft imaging system (Life Science - ©Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions v5) and expressed in μm.

Caspase-3/7 and 9 activities

Caspase-Glo® 3/7 and Caspase-Glo® 9 Assays (Promega) were used to assess apoptosis. For each assay the same procedure was followed: A549 cells were seeded into an opaque polystyrene 96-well microtitre plate in six replicates. Following treatment, the Caspase-Glo® 3/7 and Caspase-Glo® 9 reagents were prepared according to manufacturer’s guidelines. 100 μl of the reagent was added per well and incubated in the dark (30 min, RT). Following incubation, the luminescence was measured on a Modulus™ microplate luminometer. The data was expressed as RLU and fold change.

Western blotting

Western Blots were performed to determine the expression of Nrf2, p53, Smac/DIABLO and PARP-1. Briefly, total protein was isolated using Cytobuster™ reagent supplemented with protease inhibitor (Roche, cat. no. 05892791001) and phosphatase inhibitor (Roche, cat. no. 04906837001). The bicinchoninic acid assay (Sigma, Germany) was used to quantify the protein and was standardised to 2.042 mg/ml [29]. The samples were prepared in Laemmli buffer [30], boiled (100°C, 5 min) and electrophoresed (150 V, 1 h) in 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels using a Bio-Rad compact power supply. The separated proteins were electro-transferred to nitrocellulose membrane using the Trans-Blot® Turbo Transfer system (Bio-Rad) (20 V, 45 min). The membranes were blocked (1 h) using 3% BSA in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.5% Tween20 (TTBS - NaCl, KCL, Tris, Tween 20, dH2O, pH 7.4). Thereafter, the membranes were immune-probed with primary antibody [Nrf2 (ab89443), p53 (ab26), PARP-1 (ab110915), 1:1,000; Smac/DIABLO (ab68352), 1:200] at 4°C overnight. The membranes were then washed 4× with TTBS (10 min each) and incubated with the secondary antibody (ab97046; 1:2,000) at RT for 1 h. The membranes were finally washed 4× with TTBS (10 min each). To correct for loading error and to normalise the expression of the proteins, β-actin was assessed (ab8226; 1:5,000). Horse radish peroxidase (HRP) chemiluminescence detector and enhancer solution was used for the antigen-antibody complex and the signal was detected with the Alliance 2.7 image documentation system (UViTech). The expression of the proteins were analysed with UViBand Advanced Image Analysis software v12.14 (UViTech). The data was expressed as relative band density (RBD) and fold change.

Quantification of mRNA

To determine p53 and Nrf2 mRNA expression, RNA was first isolated from control and MOE treatment by adding 500 μl Tri reagent (Am9738) as per manufacturer’s guidelines. Thereafter, RNA was quantified (Nanodrop 2000) and standardised to 100 ng/μl. RNA was reverse transcribed by reverse transcriptase into copy DNA (cDNA) using the RT2 First Strand Kit (SABiosciences, C-03) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a 20 μl reaction was prepared by adding 10 μl genomic DNA elimination mixture (Total RNA, 5× gDNA elimination buffer, H2O) to 10 μl of RT cocktail (5× RT buffer 3, primer and external control mix, RT enzyme mix, H2O). The reaction was then subjected to 42°C (15 min) and 95°C (5 min) (GeneAmp® PCR System 9700, Applied Biosystems) to obtain cDNA. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to determine mRNA expression using RT2 SYBR® Green qPCR Master Mix (SABiosciences). A 25 μl reaction consisting of 12.5 μl IQ™ SYBR® green supermix (cat. no. 170–8880), 8.5 μl nuclease-free water, 2 μl cDNA, and 1 μl sense and anti-sense primer (10 mM, inqaba biotec™, Table 1) were used. The mRNA expression was compared and normalised to a housekeeping gene, GAPDH.
Table 1

Primer sequences used in qPCR assay


Primer sequence


Sense Primer

Anti-sense Primer










The reaction was subjected to an initial denaturation (95°C, 10 min). It was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 15 s), annealing (Nrf2: 57°C, 40s; p53: 56°C, 40 s) and extension (72°C, 30 s) (Chromo 4 Real-Time PCR detector, Biorad). The data was analysed using MJ opticon monitor analysis software V3.1, Biorad. The mRNA expression was determined using the Livak method and expressed as fold changes [31].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v5.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, USA). The results were expressed as means with standard deviation (SD). The concentration-response-inhibition equation was used to determine IC50 for MTT assay. The statistical significances were determined by unpaired t-test and a 95% confidence interval. The data were considered statistically significant with a value of p < 0.05.


Cell viability assay

The MTT assay measures cell viability based on the generation of reducing equivalents in metabolic active cells. The A549 cell viability (%) data is presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Viability of A549 cells treated with MOE for 24 h

Concentration (μg/ml)

Mean OD ± SD

Cell viability (%)

0 (Control)

1.469 ± 0.008



1.177 ± 0.058



1.120 ± 0.132



1.001 ± 0.118



1.201 ± 0.082



1.170 ± 0.110



0.966 ± 0.158



0.922 ± 0.177



0.984 ± 0.350


OD optical density, SD standard deviation.

Using GraphPad prism, an IC50 value of 166.7 μg/ml was calculated. This concentration of MOE was used in all subsequent assays.

Assessment of oxidative stress

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) induce oxidative stress. Lipid peroxidation, caused by ROS, was assayed by quantifying MDA presented in Figure 1A.
Figure 1

Oxidative stress induced by MOE on A549 cells. An increase in MDA levels (lipid peroxidation) (A) and decreased intracellular GSH levels (B) in MOE treated cells (**p < 0.001).

There was a significant increase in MDA levels in MOE treatment as compared to the untreated cells (0.269 ± 0.013 μM vs 0.197 ± 0.016 μM, p < 0.001). GSH levels were significantly decreased in the MOE treatment compared to the control [Figure 1B (2.507 × 106 ± 0.081 × 106 RLU vs 3.751 × 106 ± 0.110 × 106 RLU, p < 0.001): Additional file 1].

DNA damage

The comet assay assessed DNA damage and the comet tail lengths were measured in MOE treated and untreated A549 cells (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Comet assay images of control and MOE treatments for 24 h. DNA damage was higher in cells exposed to MOE (B) then control cells (A) (100×, ***p < 0.0001).

There was a significant increase in comet tail length in MOE treatment compared to the control (18.52 ± 4.90 μm vs 5.15 ± 1.18 μm, p < 0.0001).

Assessment of caspase-3/7 and 9 activities

Intracellular activity of caspases-3/7 and caspase-9 was measured. Table 3 presents the apoptotic induction in A549 cells.
Table 3

Apoptotic markers of A549 cells following treatment for 24 h


Mean ± SD (RLU x 105)

Fold change





2.097 ± 0.489

3.196 ± 0.261




12.630 ± 0.020

16.160 ± 0.702


< 0.05*

*p < 0.05: statistically significant compared to the control, SD: standard deviation, RLU relative light units.

There was an increase (non-significant) in caspase-3/7 activity and a significant increase in caspase-9 activity in MOE treatment compared to the control (Table 3).

Western blotting

To determine the effect of MOE on protein expression we assessed the levels of Nrf2, p53, Smac/DIABLO and PARP-1 using western blot (Figure 3).
Figure 3

MOE regulating protein expression in A549 cells. Differential expression of Nrf2, p53, Smac/DIABLO, PARP-89 KDa and 24 KDa fragment in A549 cells after treatment with MOE for 24 h.

MOE induced a significant 1.89-fold decrease in Nrf2 expression [Figure 3 (0.069 ± 0.007 RBD vs control: 0.129 ± 0.022 RBD, p < 0.05)]; a 1.02-fold increase in p53 expression [Figure 3 (0.567 ± 0.002 RBD vs control: 0.558 ± 0.002 RBD, p < 0.05)] and a 1.06-fold increase in Smac/DIABLO expression [Figure 3 (1.509 ± 0.055 RBD vs control: 1.425 ± 0.007 RBD, p = 0.162)]. During apoptosis, PARP-1 is proteolysed by caspases to an 89 KDa and 24 KDa fragment. There was a significant 1.27-fold decrease in the expression of PARP 89 KDa fragment in the MOE treatment compared to the control [Figure 3 (0.234 ± 0.005 RBD vs 0.297 ± 0.005 RBD, p < 0.0001)] and a 1.46-fold increase in the level of PARP 24 KDa fragment [Figure 3 (0.419 ± 0.014 RBD vs 0.286 ± 0.016 RBD, p < 0.0001); Additional file 1].

Quantification of mRNA

The mRNA expression of Nrf2 and p53 in A549 cells was determined using qPCR relative to the control (Figure 4).
Figure 4

The effect of MOE on mRNA expression. MOE regulated the Nrf2 and p53 mRNA expression in A549 cells after treatment for 24 h (**p < 0.001).

The Nrf2 mRNA expression was decreased 1.44 ± 0.03-fold (p < 0.001) in MOE treatment (Figure 4). A 1.59 ± 0.41-fold (p = 0.168) increase in p53 mRNA expression was observed in MOE treated cells.


MO, a widely consumed traditional plant, is used to treat various ailments such as cancer [13]. Cancer is listed as the fourth leading cause of death in SA [3], with lung cancer expected to increase. This is a first study to show a possible biochemical mechanism of action of MOE on cancerous A549 cells.

Reactive oxygen species are known to induce many diseases [32]. These oxidants damage membrane phospholipids and results in lipid peroxidation [2, 27]. This study showed that MOE significantly increased lipid peroxidation as measured by elevated levels of MDA. This lipid peroxidation compromises cell membranes and their function. In addition, the mitochondrial membranes may become dysfunctional and lead to uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and increased electron leak from the respiratory chain. These oxidants also react with proteins and DNA in the cell [33].

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) oxidises cysteine in GSH to produce glutathione disulphide (GSSG), thereby decreasing the antioxidant capacity of GSH. GSH levels were significantly decreased in MOE-treated A549 cells with a corresponding significant increase in lipid peroxidation (Figure 1).

The mRNA plays a pivotal role in protein synthesis as it is used as a template and thus translated into protein [34]. The transcription factor nuclear factor-erythroid 2 p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is important in antioxidant defence as it protects the cell from oxidative stress. Nrf2 dissociates from Kelch-like epichlorohydrin-associated protein 1 (Keap1) and translocates to the nucleus and binds to the antioxidant-response elements in promoter regions of antioxidant genes thus increasing transcription [35, 36]. Nrf2 regulates the synthesis of GSH and MOE reduced mRNA expression by 1.44-fold (Figure 4) [34]. This resulted in a significant decrease in Nrf2 protein expression in A549 cells, (Figure 3) which leads to decreased transcription of important antioxidant genes and increased oxidative damage [37]. The suppression of Nrf2 expression may explain the antiproliferative effect of MOE in this cell line. A consequence is that the endogenous antioxidant GSH is not replenished adequately and will result in increased oxidants and ultimately to cell death.

The increase in oxidative stress is genotoxic to the cell. H2O2 can react with metal ions such as iron and produce highly reactive hydroxyl radicals that target DNA [22]. ROS-mediated DNA damage can be a therapeutic target in cancer cells as it signals nucleases to cause DNA strand breaks. The MOE induced significant DNA strand breaks and fragmentation in the alveolar epithelial cells (Figure 2). Again this finding shows that MOE possess pro-apoptotic and antiproliferative properties.

To further confirm the pro-apoptotic action of MOE, we investigated its effect on p53 mRNA and protein expression. MOE increased p53 mRNA expression (Figure 4) with a significant increase in the expression of p53 protein in A549 treated cells (Figure 3). It is known that an increase in oxidative stress and DNA damage results in apoptosis [38, 39]. DNA damage up-regulates signals for repair and apoptosis. The increased expression of p53 correlates well with the increased DNA damage by MOE. This signals for apoptosis via Bax activation, a pro-apoptotic protein, which causes mitochondrial depolarisation and cytochrome c release from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm. Cytochrome c, together with Apaf-1 and ATP forms an apoptosome resulting in pro-caspase-9 cleavage and activation of caspase-9. MOE significantly increased (1.28-fold) caspase-9 activity, which in turn activates the executioner caspases-3/7 (1.52-fold increase) (Table 3). Caspase-3/7 activity can be inhibited by inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins [40, 41]. The protein, Smac/DIABLO is concurrently released from the mitochondria with cytochrome c and inhibits IAP proteins thus ensuring execution of apoptosis. MOE afforded a slight increase on Smac/DIABLO expression (1.06-fold) [Figure 3 (1.509 ± 0.055 RBD vs control: 1.425 ± 0.007 RBD, p = 0.162)] that could contribute to the apoptotic pathway.

In addition PARP-1 cleavage was investigated. During apoptosis, caspases are activated resulting in the cleavage of PARP-1 [6]. PARP-1, a nuclear enzyme, is proteolysed to an 89 KDa C-terminal catalytic fragment and a 24 KDa N-terminal DNA-binding domain fragment [42]. PARP-1 (important in DNA base excision repair) maintains the integrity of the genome [43]. MOE increased caspase-3/7 activity in A549 cells which resulted in cleavage of PARP-1 into 2 fragments [44]. There was a significant (1.46-fold) increase in the expression of the 24 KDa fragment (Figure 3) in MOE treated cells. This increased cleavage of the smaller PARP-1 fragment correlates well with the increased DNA damage by MOE (p < 0.0001).

The phytoconstituents of MOE were shown to possess antiproliferative effects on various cell lines [20]. The leaves contain glucosinolates, isothiocyanates, niazimicin, niaziminin and quercetin which attributes to the anticancer effect [11, 20, 21]. In addition the leaves also contain other thiocarbamate, carbamates and nitrile glycosides [20].

A recent study showed the significance of MO phytochemicals in prostate cancer therapy [21]. Niazimicin and 4-(4’-O-acetyl-α-L-rhamnopyranosyloxy) benzyl isothiocyanate were identified as natural anticancer agents and compared favourably with the recommended chemotherapeutic drug, Estramustine. These phytochemicals enhanced the activity of cellular prostatic acid phosphatase and possessed less toxicity, thus showing potential as a potent and safe natural agent in prostate cancer therapy and drug design [21]. Similarly these active compounds in MOE can act as anticancer agents in lung cancer by inducing cellular apoptosis and subsequent cell death.

An in vivo study on the anticancer activity of MOE on B16 F10 melanoma tumors in mice, revealed that treatment at 500 mg/kg-bw could delay tumor growth and increase lifespan [20]. The anticancer activity was attributed to the phytochemicals quercetin, niazimicin and niaziminin. The therapeutic and nutritional use of MOE is safe at doses below 2 g/kg-bw [45]. Similarly the antiproliferative effect of MOE observed in the A549 cancerous cells may be due to the phytochemicals (e.g., isothiocyanates, niazimicin, niaziminin and quercetin) in the plant leaves.


The MO leaves possess antiproliferative properties as evidenced by an increase in oxidative stress leading to apoptosis of lung cancer cells. The results from the study provide a biochemical mechanism underlying the usage of MOE as a therapeutic agent in lung cancer therapy. It shows a promising complementary and alternative treatment for lung cancer. Furthermore, phytochemical analysis and the effect of MOE on other cancerous cell lines need to be assessed.



Bovine serum albumin


Complete culture media


Copy DNA


Dimethyl sulphoxide


Ethidium bromide






Glutathione disulphide


Human immunodeficiency virus


Horse radish peroxidase


Hydrogen peroxide


Inhibitor of apoptosis


Kelch-like epichlorohydrin-associated protein 1


Low melting point agarose




Messenger RNA


Moringa oleifera


MO leaf extract


Methyl thiazol tetrazolium


Nuclear factor-erythroid 2 p45-related factor 2


Optical density


Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase


Reactive oxygen species


Room temperature


Relative light units


Relative band density


South Africa


Standard deviation


Thiobarbituric acid assay


Thiobarbituric acid (1%)/0.1 mM butylated hydroxytoluene solution


Quantitative polymerase chain reaction.



Miss C. Tiloke acknowledges the prestigious Masters scholarship from the National Research Foundation, South Africa. The study was also supported by the funds from College of Health Sciences (UKZN).

Authors’ Affiliations

Discipline of Medical Biochemistry, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal
Postal address: Discipline of Medical Biochemistry, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal


  1. GLOBOCAN 2008 estimated cancer incidence, mortality, prevalence and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) worldwide in 2008. 2008,, estimated cancer incidence, mortality, prevalence and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) worldwide in 2008,
  2. Rahman I: Oxidative stress, chromatin remodeling and gene transcription in inflammation and chronic lung diseases. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2003, 36: 95-109. 10.5483/BMBRep.2003.36.1.095.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bello B, Fadahun O, Kielkowski D, Nelson G: Trends in lung cancer mortality in South Africa: 1995–2006. BMC Public Health. 2011, 11: 1-5. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sharma H, Parihar L, Parihar P: Review on cancer and anticancerous properties of some medicinal plants. J Med Plant Res. 2011, 5: 1818-1835.Google Scholar
  5. Fan TJ, Han LH, Cong RS, Liang J: Caspase family proteases and apoptosis. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2005, 37: 719-727. 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2005.00108.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Radhakrishna Pillai G, Srivastava AS, Hassanein TI, Chauhan DP, Carrier E: Induction of apoptosis in human lung cancer cells by curcumin. Cancer Lett. 2004, 208: 163-170. 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.01.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nithipongvanitch R, Ittarat W, Velez JM, Zhao R, St Clair DK, Oberley TD: Evidence for p53 as guardian of the cardiomyocyte mitochondrial genome following acute adriamycin treatment. J Histochem Cytochem. 2007, 55: 629-639. 10.1369/jhc.6A7146.2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Halappanavar SS, Le Rhun Y, Mounir S, Martins LM, Huot J, Earnshaw WC, Shah GM: Survival and proliferation of cells expressing caspase-uncleavable poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in response to death-inducing DNA damage by an alkylating agent. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 37097-37104. 10.1074/jbc.274.52.37097.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Frunze P, Hamed D, Abdo H, Timothy S: Targeted therapy for lung cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2012, 23: 1016-1021. 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283585149.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Gericke N, Albrecht CF, Van Wyke B, Mayeng B, Mutwa C, Hutchings A: Sutherlandia frutescens. Am J Men’s Health. 2001, 13: 9-15.Google Scholar
  11. Fahey JW: Moringa oleifera: a review of the medical evidence for its nutritional, therapeutic, and prophylactic properties. Part 1. Trees Life J. 2005, 1-5.Google Scholar
  12. Goyal BR, Agrawal BB, Goyal RK, Mehta AA: Phyto-pharmacology of Moringa oleifera Lam. An overview. Nat Prod Rad. 2007, 6: 347-353.Google Scholar
  13. Djakalia B, Guichard BL, Soumaila D: Effect of Moringa oleifera on growth performance and health status of young post-weaning rabbits. Res J Poultry Sci. 2011, 4: 7-13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sreelatha S, Jeyachitra A, Padma PR: Antiproliferation and induction of apoptosis by Moringa oleifera leaf extract on human cancer cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011, 49: 1270-1275. 10.1016/j.fct.2011.03.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cajuday LA, Pocsidio GL: Effects of Moringa oleifera Lam. (Moringaceae) on the reproduction of male mice (Mus musculus). J Med Plants Res. 2010, 4: 1115-1121.Google Scholar
  16. Siddhuraju P, Becker K: Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts of total phenolic constituents from three different agroclimatic origins of drumstick tree (Moringa oleifera Lam.) leaves. J Agric Food Chem. 2003, 51: 2144-2155. 10.1021/jf020444+.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Manguro LOA, Lemmen P: Phenolics of Moringa oleifera leaves. Nat Prod Res. 2007, 21: 56-68. 10.1080/14786410601035811.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guevara AP, Vargas C, Sakurai H, Fujiwara Y, Hashimoto K, Maoka T, Kozuka M, Ito Y, Tokuda H, Nishino H: An antitumor promoter from Moringa oleifera Lam. Mutat Res. 1999, 440: 181-188. 10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00025-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Anwar F, Latif S, Ashraf M, Gilani AH: Moringa oleifera: a food plant with multiple medicinal uses. Phytother Res. 2007, 21: 17-25. 10.1002/ptr.2023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Purwal L, Pathak AK, Jain UK: In vivo anticancer activity of the leaves and fruits of Moringa oleifera on mouse melanoma. Pharmacologyonline. 2010, 1: 655-665.Google Scholar
  21. Inbathamizh L, Padmini E: Insilico studies on the enhancing effect of anti-cancer phytochemicals of Moringa oleifera on cellular prostatic acid phosphatase activity. Drug Invent Today. 2011, 3: 186-192.Google Scholar
  22. Sreelatha S, Padma PR: Modulatory effects of Moringa oleifera extracts against hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative damage. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011, 30: 1359-1368. 10.1177/0960327110391385.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson K, Walker J: Principles and techniques of biochemistry and molecular biology. 2005, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Phulukdaree A, Moodley D, Chuturgoon AA: The effects of Sutherlandia frutescens extracts in cultured renal proximal and distal tubule epithelial cells. S Afri J Sci. 2010, 106: 1-5.Google Scholar
  25. Prasad TNVKV, Elumalai EK: Biofabrication of Ag nanoparticles using Moringa oleifera leaf extract and their antimicrobial activity. Asian Pacific J Trop Biomed. 2011, 439-442.Google Scholar
  26. Mossman T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assay. J Immunol Methods. 1983, 65: 55-63. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Halliwell B, Chirico S: Lipid peroxidation: its mechanism, measurement and significance. Am J Clin Nutrit. 1993, 57: 715S-725S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL: A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res. 1988, 1751: 184-191.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Bainor A, Chang L, McQuade TJ, Webb B, Gestwicki JE: Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay in low volume. Anal Biochem. 2011, 410: 310-312. 10.1016/j.ab.2010.11.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang Y, Ma H: Western blotting and ELISA techniques. Research. 2009, 1: 67-86.Google Scholar
  31. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-∆∆CT method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ashok Kumar N, Pari L: Antioxidant action of Moringa oleifera Lam. (drumstick) against antitubercular drugs induced lipid peroxidation in rats. J Med Food. 2003, 6: 255-259. 10.1089/10966200360716670.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bartosz G: Reactive oxygen species: destroyers or messengers?. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009, 77: 1303-1315. 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.11.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cooper GM: The cell. A molecular approach. 2000, Boston, USA: Sunderland: Sinauer AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  35. Harvey CJ, Thimmulappa RK, Singh A, Blake DJ, Ling G, Wakabayashi N, Fujii J, Myers A, Biswal S: Nrf2-regulated glutathione recycling independent of biosynthesis is critical for cell survival during oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009, 46: 443-453. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.10.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh A, Misra V, Thimmulappa RK, Lee H, Ames S, Hoque MO, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Sidransky D, Gabrielson E, Brock MV, Biswal S: Dysfunctional KEAP1-NRF2 interaction in non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS Med. 2006, 3: 1865-1876.Google Scholar
  37. Lewis KN, Mele J, Hayes JD, Buffenstein R: Nrf2, a guardian of healthspan and gatekeeper of species longevity. Integr Comp Biol. 2010, 50: 829-843. 10.1093/icb/icq034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Bertram JS: The molecular biology of cancer. Mol Aspects Med. 2001, 21: 167-223.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson CB: Apoptosis in the pathogenesis and treatment of disease. Science. 1995, 267: 1456-1462. 10.1126/science.7878464.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hengartner MO: The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nature. 2000, 407: 770-776. 10.1038/35037710.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang X: The expanding role of mitochondria in apoptosis. Genes Dev. 2001, 15: 2922-2933.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. D’Amours D, Sallmann FR, Dixit VM, Poirier GG: Gain-of-function of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 upon cleavage by apoptotic proteases: implications for apoptosis. J Cell Sci. 2001, 114: 3771-3778.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Eustermann S, Videler H, Yang J, Cole PT, Gruszka D, Veprintsev D, Neuhaus D: The DNA-binding domain of human PARP-1 interacts with DNA single-strand breaks as a monomer through its second zinc finger. J Mol Biol. 2011, 407: 149-170. 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Pagano A, Pitteloud C, Reverdin C, Metrailler-Ruchonnet I, Donati Y, Argiroffo CB: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase activation mediates lung epithelial cell death in vitro but is not essential in hyperoxia-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005, 33: 555-564. 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0361OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Adedapo AA, Mogbojuri OM, Emikpe BO: Safety evaluations of the aqueous extract of the leaves of Moringa oleifera in rats. J Med Plants Res. 2009, 3: 585-591.Google Scholar
  46. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Tiloke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.