Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Differential proteomics analysis of the analgesic effect of electroacupuncture intervention in the hippocampus following neuropathic pain in rats

  • Yong-Hui Gao1,
  • Shu-Ping Chen1,
  • Jun-Ying Wang1,
  • Li-Na Qiao1,
  • Fan-Ying Meng1,
  • Qiu-Ling Xu1 and
  • Jun-Ling Liu1Email author
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201212:241

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-241

Received: 20 September 2012

Accepted: 27 November 2012

Published: 2 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
20 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Efferth
5 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yanjun Zeng
19 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - yonghui gao
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
2 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-12-241

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences