Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers’ views of chronic low back pain patients’ expectations of CAM therapies: a qualitative study
© Schafer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 4 September 2012
Accepted: 22 November 2012
Published: 27 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deirdre McLaughlin|
|19 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iben Axén|
|24 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emma Kirby|
|26 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tobias Sundberg|
|5 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Sherman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iben Axén|
|7 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emma Kirby|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|27 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-12-234|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.