Hypericum perforatum treatment: effect on behaviour and neurogenesis in a chronic stress model in mice
© Crupi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 30 July 2010
Accepted: 27 January 2011
Published: 27 January 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Jul 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Grundmann|
|25 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicolas Singewald|
|28 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Edoardo Spina|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicolas Singewald|
|14 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Grundmann|
|9 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Edoardo Spina|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicolas Singewald|
|25 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Edoardo Spina|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Jan 2011||Editorially accepted|
|27 Jan 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-11-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.