Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Use of multivitamins, folic acid and herbal supplements among breast cancer survivors: the black women's health study

  • Mireille Bright-Gbebry1,
  • Kepher H Makambi1,
  • JoyAnn Phillips Rohan1,
  • Adana A Llanos1,
  • Lynn Rosenberg2,
  • Julie R Palmer2 and
  • Lucile L Adams-Campbell1Email author
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201111:30

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-30

Received: 17 November 2010

Accepted: 15 April 2011

Published: 15 April 2011

Abstract

Background

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use, including herbals and multivitamin supplements, is quite common in the U.S., and has been shown to be highest in breast cancer survivors. However, limited data are currently available for CAM usage among African Americans. Thus, we sought to determine the prevalence of multivitamins, folic acid and herbal supplement usage in African American breast cancer survivors, and to compare the characteristics of users and nonusers.

Methods

A cohort study of breast cancer survivors, who completed the 1999 Black Women's Health Study questionnaire and self-reported having been diagnosed with breast cancer between 1995 and 1999, comprised the study population. In this study, the intake of natural herbs, multivitamins and folic acid at least three days per week within the past two years was used as a proxy for typical usage of this complimentary alternative medicine (CAM) modality.

Results

A total of 998 breast cancer survivors were identified. Overall, 68.2% had used either herbals or multivitamin supplements or both. The three most frequently used herbals were garlic (21.2%), gingko (12.0%), and echinacea (9.4%). The multivariate analysis determined that single marital status (OR = 1.58; 95%CI: 1.04-2.41), and alcohol consumption of 1-3 drinks per week (OR = 1.86, 95%CI: 1.28-2.68) were significantly associated with increased herbal use. Multivitamin use was significantly lower among obese women (OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.46-0.94) and current smokers (OR = 0.53, 95%CI: 0.34-0.82).

Conclusions

A significant number of African American breast cancer survivors are using herbals and multivitamins as CAM modality. Additional research is needed to understand the impact of herbals and multivitamins in African American breast cancer survivors.

Background

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), including herbals and multivitamin supplements, is widely used in the U.S. general population [16]. Among U.S. adults, it was found that 18% surveyed in 2002 consumed herbals according to evidence-based indications [6]. Herbals (natural products), including echinacea (19.8%) and ginseng (14.1%) [5, 7] are two of the most commonly used. Women use more CAM (69%) overall compared to men [8, 9] and CAM use has been particularly common among women 30-69 years old, who engage in positive health behaviors (e.g. non-smoking,) and those with pre-existing health conditions [7, 1012]. However, limited data are available on CAM usage among African Americans. In a survey of U.S. households conducted from 1998-2004, Kelly et al., [13] found that the prevalence of use of any herbal/natural product during the past week was lowest in African Americans (9.5%) and highest in whites (19%). NHANES III and NHIS data also show a lower prevalence of herbal supplement use or vitamins in African Americans [14, 15].

CAM usage has been reported to be high among adult cancer survivors, [1618] with estimates ranging from 36% to 84% [18, 19]. CAM use is highest among breast cancer survivors as compared to survivors of other tumor sites [20]. Herbals are commonly used in breast cancer patients in particular [21]. Brown et al., [22] demonstrated that African Americans use herbals for disease prevention, health promotion and treatment of disease conditions but are less likely to disclose their herbal use to their health-care providers than Caucasians [23].

There are limited data available on the use of CAM and more specifically herbals, multivitamins, and folic acid, which we will refer to as CAM in this study, among African American breast cancer survivors. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of CAM use in African American breast cancer survivors and to determine the factors associated with CAM use.

Methods

Study design

The present study includes a cohort study of breast cancer survivors in the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS). The BWHS is a national prospective cohort of African American women in the United States [24]. In 1995, 59,000 women between the ages of 21-69 years enrolled in the study by responding to mailed questionnaires targeting African American women audiences including Essence magazine subscribers, members of several African American professional associations, and relatives and friends of early respondents. The baseline questionnaire collected information on demographics, medical history and medication usage, and lifestyle factors including diet, cigarettes smoking and alcohol intake. Since the inception of the study, follow-up questionnaires have been mailed to participants every 2 years to update information on exposures and to identify new or recurrent illnesses such as breast cancer. Follow-up rates have been over 80% for each questionnaire cycle since 1995. The Institutional Review Boards of Boston University Medical Center and Georgetown University approved the study protocol.

Study population

The study population comprised women who reported a diagnosis of breast cancer before enrollment in the study in 1995 or during the first four years of follow-up through 1999 and who completed the CAM use section, i.e., herbals, multivitamins, and folic acid of the 1999 questionnaire. A total of 998 breast cancer survivors were included in the present study. Breast cancer cases were identified through responses on biennial follow-up questionnaires. Pathology data were obtained through participant medical records and through state cancer registries. Medical records and cancer registry data were also used to confirm self-reported cases of breast cancer.

Independent variables

The current data were obtained from the 1999 questionnaire which asked about herbal and multivitamin use over a two-year period from March 1997 to March 1999. The herbals listed on the survey were echinacea, garlic, ginger, St. John's wort, ginkgo, chamomile, feverfew, hawthorn, milk thistle, goldenseal, ginseng, aloe, Ephedra products, and cat's claw. Participants marked all herbals that applied. Separate questions asked about multivitamins and/or folic acid usage. Breast cancer survivors were classified as users if they used any herbals, multivitamins or folic acid at least three days per week during the previous 2-year period. Socio-Demographic characteristics were self-reported and included age (continuous), education, height, weight, marital status (married/living as married, single) and family history of breast cancer (in a mother or sibling).

Body Mass Index (BMI) ( kg/m2 ) was calculated as weight/height2 and categorized into three groups; ≤25 (normal), 25-29 (overweight) and ≥30 (obese). Cigarette Smoking was dichotomized as non-smokers and current smokers and current alcohol consumption was defined as the number of drinks consumed per week and grouped as non-drinker, 1-3 drinks/week and ≥ 4 drinks/week. We categorized physical activity within the past year into two clusters: walking for exercise (e.g., housework, bowling, gardening), and vigorous physical activity (e.g., basketball, swimming, aerobics); and dichotomized as ≤ 2 hour/week or >2 hour/week of vigorous physical activity. Participants were classified as either pre- or postmenopausal. Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) was ascertained by a dichotomous variable answering the question, "Between March 1997 and March 1999, have you taken female hormones for menopause?"

Statistical analysis

The distribution of socio-demographic and other characteristics was presented as percentages, and comparisons of these characteristics between herbals and multivitamins/folic acid users and non-users were done using chi-square tests and t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Prevalence odds ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals from unconditional logistic regressions were used to determine the factors associated with the use of herbals or multivitamins. SAS version 9.2 was used to conduct these analyses and the level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results

Among the 998 breast cancer survivors, 681 (68.2%) had used either herbals or vitamin supplements or both; 53.6% of the women had used vitamin supplements, and 39% had used one or more herbal supplements. The three most frequently used herbals were garlic (21.2%), gingko (12.0%), and echinacea (9.4%), (Table 1). Separately, we conducted analyses to determine whether there were differences in CAM usage by years since diagnosis (<5 years since diagnosis versus ≥5 years since diagnosis). Mean ages of the breast cancer survivors were 54.7 and 52.1 years for users and non-users, respectively. CAM use was significantly higher among survivors who were well educated, postmenopausal and non-smokers (Table 2). However, we found no significant differences for use of garlic, gingko, echinacea, or any other herbal, vitamin, or combination by years since diagnosis (chi square p-values >0.05) (data not shown).
Table 1

Herbals and vitamins use among breast cancer survivors, BWHS, 1999

 

Reporting use (%)

(n = 998)

Herbals

 

   Any herbal

39.0

   Garlic

21.2

   Gingko

12.0

   Echinacea

9.4

   Ginseng

8.0

   Goldenseal

5.1

   Ginger

4.7

   Chamomille

4.6

   Aloe

4.3

   St. John's Wort

4.1

   Milk Thisle

2.0

   Hawthorn

1.0

   Cat's Claw

0.9

   Feverfew

0.4

   Ephedra products

0.3

Vitamins/Minerals

 

   Multivitamins

53.6

   Folic-acid (alone)

4.6

Any Herbals/Vitamins

 

   One

35.6

   Two

16.7

   Three

6.7

   At least four

8.3

Table 2

Demographic and other characteristics of breast cancer survivors by herbals and multivitamins/folic acid use, BWHS

Variable

CAM USERS

(n = 681)

CAM NON-USERS

(n = 317)

Age, years (Mean ± SD)

54.7 ± 9.5

52.1 ± 9.4

Education, years (%)*

  

   ≤12

20.7

28.1

   13-15

28.5

29.3

   ≥ 16

50.7

42.6

BMI, kg/m 2 (Mean ± SD)

29.3 ± 6.0

30.5 ± 9.4

BMI, kg/m 2 (%)

  

   <25

23.2

19.6

   25-29

37.0

33.1

   ≥ 30

38.0

42.7

Married (%)

  

   Married/living as married

40.1

41.3

   Single

14.4

12.3

   Divorced/separated/widowed

42.6

41.0

Menopausal Status (%)*

  

   Premenopausal

12.3

16.7

   Postmenopausal

71.1

59.0

Hormonal replacement therapy use (%)

  

   No

89.0

86.8

   Yes

9.7

8.8

Family history of breast cancer (%)

  

   No

81.1

77.9

   Yes

18.9

22.1

Cigarette smoking (%)*

  

   Non-smoker

90.8

83.2

   Current smoker

9.2

16.8

Alcohol consumption (%)

  

   Non-drinker

70.2

73.8

   1-3 drinks/week

16.7

12.9

   ≥ drinks/week

8.5

6.6

Walking for exercise (%)

  

   ≤ 2 hours/week

80.0

84.9

   >2 hours/week

12.6

9.5

Vigorous physical activity (%)

  

   ≤ 2 hours/week

81.8

88.0

   >2 hours/week

9.1

6.0

*p value <0.05, percentages do not add to 100% due to missing values

Multivariate analysis of selected variables and herbals and multivitamins/folic acid use among breast cancer survivors are presented in Table 3. The variables that were significantly associated with increased herbal use in African American breast cancer survivors were marital status/single relative to married/living as married (OR = 1.58; 95% CI:1.04-2.41, and alcohol consumption of 1-3 drinks per week compared to non-drinkers (OR = 1.86, 95% CI:1.28-2.68). Single marital status was associated with increased multivitamin use (OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.02-2.39). Multivitamin use was significantly lower among obese women (OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.46-0.94) and current smokers (OR = 0.53, 95%CI: 0.34-0.82).
Table 3

Multivariate analysis of selected variables associated with use of herbals and multivitamins/folic acid among breast cancer survivors

Variable

HERBALS USERS

MULTIVITAMINS/

FOLIC ACID

 

Adjusted OR+(95% CI)

Adjusted OR+(95% CI)

Age (years)

1.01 (0.99,1.03)

1.02 (1.01,1.04)*

Education

  

   ≤ 12

1.00

1.00

   13-15

0.96 (0.66,1.40)

1.38 (0.95,1.99)

   ≥ 16

0.95 (0.67,1.39)

1.29 (0.91,1.81)

BMI (kg/m 2 )

  

   <25

1.00

1.00

   25-29

0.97 (0.67,1.39)

0.84 (0.58,1.20)

   ≥ 30

0.75 (0.34,1.63)

0.66 (0.46,0.94)*

Marital status

  

   Married/living as married

1.00

1.00

   Single

1.58 (1.04,2.41)*

1.56 (1.02,2.39)*

   Divorced/separated/widowed

1.16 (0.86,1.56)

1.05 (0.78,1.40)

Menopausal Status

  

   Premenopausal

1.00

1.00

   Postmenopausal

1.37 (0.86,2.20)

1.16 (0.74,1.36)

Hormonal replacement therapy use

  

   No

1.00

1.00

   Yes

1.00 (0.63,1.57)

0.86 (0.55,1.36)

Family history of breast cancer

  

   No

1.00

1.00

   Yes

0.73 (0.52,1.03)

0.94 (0.68,1.31)

Cigarette smoking

  

   Non-smoker

1.00

1.00

   Current smoker

0.62 (0.39,0.97)*

0.53 (0.34,0.82)*

Alcohol consumption

  

   Non-drinker

1.00

1.00

   1-3 drinks/week

1.86 (1.28,2.68)*

1.30 (0.89,1.88)

   ≥ 4 drinks/week

1.50 (0.94,2.39)

1.37 (0.85,2.20)

Walking for exercise

  

   ≤ 2 hours/week

1.00

1.00

   >2 hours/week

1.43 (0.94,2.17)

1.28 (0.84,1.94)

Vigorous physical activity

  

   ≤ 2 hours/week

1.00

1.00

   >2 hours/week

1.37 (0.83,2.23)

1.20 (0.72,1.98)

*Significant odds ratios, p < 0.05; each variable is adjusted for the other variables

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the largest study of CAM usage, as defined by herbals and multivitamins use, among African American breast cancer survivors. Several national cross-sectional and case-control studies have reported on the use of complementary and alternative medicine in breast cancer survivors [2, 16, 19, 25], but few have reported on herbals and multivitamins [13, 14, 22, 26], and in African American breast cancer survivors in particular [13, 27, 28].

Our study indicates that over 50% of breast cancer survivors use at least one type of CAM, including herbs or multivitamins, consistent with other cohort studies of breast cancer survivors [25, 29]. In this investigation, herbals are by far the most popular CAM products used compared to multivitamins. Excepted for garlic, which is the number one herbal used in our research, gingko, echinacea, and ginseng are among the top three herbs used, consistent with other breast cancer survivor studies [16, 21, 25]. A key finding in this research is that the prevalence rate among African American breast cancer survivors is comparable to that observed in other predominantly white cohorts of breast cancer survivors [19, 25]. Our results were also similar to reports of CAM use including larger samples of African Americans [5, 7, 13].

Of note, our multivariate analysis indicated that both obesity (BMI ≥ 30) and smoking were significantly associated with lower use of herbs and multivitamins among African American breast cancer survivors in our cohort, consistent with other cohort studies [30], and U.S. national samples [15, 26, 31], indicating a correlation of herbal and multivitamin use with healthy behaviors.

The findings of this study add to the current research on one of the most commonly used CAM modalities, herbals/multivitamins, among breast cancer survivors and particularly in an ethnic-specific group of African American women. A limitation of the study is the lack of data on reasons for using CAM; herbals may be used for both disease treatment and disease prevention. Further research is warranted to examine reasons for CAM use and specifically herbals/multivitamins prior to and after diagnosis. Additionally, questions on other modalities of CAM (e.g., home remedies, prayer) relevant for this population would be of interest.

Conclusions

Complementary and alternative medicine including herbals and multivitamin use is widespread within the U.S. population and among persons with chronic illnesses such as cancer. Previously reported differences among racial/ethnic minorities prompted us to examine the prevalence of CAM usage in African American breast cancer survivors. Further research is needed to understand the impact of CAM use and specifically herbals and multivitamins in African American breast cancer survivors. Future analyses of these data may help explain some of the observed variation in the use of individual CAM therapies within African Americans.

Declarations

Acknowledgements & funding

This grant was supported by the National Cancer Institute, RO1 CA58420, awarded to Lynn Rosenberg, ScD, Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, MA.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University
(2)
Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University

References

  1. Matthews AK, Sellergren SA, Huo D, List M, Fleming G: Complementary and alternative medicine use among breast cancer survivors. J Altern Complement Med. 2007, 13: 555-562. 10.1089/acm.2007.03-9040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM: Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005, 11: 42-49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gardiner P, Kemper KJ, Legedza A, Phillips RS: Factors associated with herb and dietary supplement use by young adults in the United States. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007, 7: 39-10.1186/1472-6882-7-39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Arcury TA, Suerken CK, Grzywacz JG, Bell RA, Lang W, Quandt SA: Complementary and alternative medicine use among older adults: ethnic variation. Ethn Dis. 2006, 16: 723-731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hsiao AF, Wong MD, Goldstein MS, Yu HJ, Andersen RM, Brown ER, Becerra LM, Wenger NS: Variation in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use across racial/ethnic groups and the development of ethnic-specific measures of CAM use. J Altern Complement Med. 2006, 12: 281-290. 10.1089/acm.2006.12.281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardia A, Nisly NL, Zimmerman MB, Gryzlak BM, Wallace RB: Use of herbs among adults based on evidence-based indications: findings from the National Health Interview Survey. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007, 82: 561-566. 10.4065/82.5.561.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL: Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Adults and Children: United States, 2007. 2010, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of HealthGoogle Scholar
  8. Mueller CM, Mai PL, Bucher J, Peters JA, Loud JT, Greene MH: Complementary and alternative medicine use among women at increased genetic risk of breast and ovarian cancer. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008, 8: 17-10.1186/1472-6882-8-17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Upchurch DM, Chyu L, Greendale GA: Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Amont American Women: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 2002. Journal of Women's Health. 2007, 16: 102-113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nahin RL, Dahlhamer JM, Taylor BL, Barnes PM, Stussman BJ, Simile CM, Blackman MR, Chesney MA, Jackson M, Miller H, et al: Health behaviors and risk factors in those who use complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Public Health. 2007, 7: 217-10.1186/1471-2458-7-217.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Ni H, Simile C, Hardy AM: Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine by United States adults: results from the 1999 national health interview survey. Med Care. 2002, 40: 353-358. 10.1097/00005650-200204000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL: Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data. 2004, 1-19.Google Scholar
  13. Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Kelley K, Rosenberg L, Mitchell AA: Use of herbal/natural supplements according to racial/ethnic group. J Altern Complement Med. 2006, 12: 555-561. 10.1089/acm.2006.12.555.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fennell D: Determinants of supplement usage. Prev Med. 2004, 39: 932-939. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Radimer KL, Subar AF, Thompson FE: Nonvitamin, nonmineral dietary supplements: issues and findings from NHANES III. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000, 100: 447-454. 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00137-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Carpenter CL, Ganz PA, Bernstein L: Complementary and alternative therapies among very long-term breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009, 116: 387-396. 10.1007/s10549-008-0158-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Velanovich V, Hallal N, Shah M: Patterns of usage of complementary and alternative medicine in general surgical patients. Int J Surg. 2006, 4: 206-211. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.03.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Morris KT, Johnson N, Homer L, Walts D: A comparison of complementary therapy use between breast cancer patients and patients with other primary tumor sites. Am J Surg. 2000, 179: 407-411. 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00358-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Buettner C, Kroenke CH, Phillips RS, Davis RB, Eisenberg DM, Holmes MD: Correlates of use of different types of complementary and alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in the nurses' health study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006, 100: 219-227. 10.1007/s10549-006-9239-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Velicer CM, Ulrich CM: Vitamin and mineral supplement use among US adults after cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 665-673. 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Graham RE, Ahn AC, Davis RB, O'Connor BB, Eisenberg DM, Phillips RS: Use of complementary and alternative medical therapies among racial and ethnic minority adults: results from the 2002 National Health Interview Survey. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005, 97: 535-545.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown CM, Barner JC, Richards KM, Bohman TM: Patterns of complementary and alternative medicine use in African Americans. J Altern Complement Med. 2007, 13: 751-758. 10.1089/acm.2006.6392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuo GM, Hawley ST, Weiss LT, Balkrishnan R, Volk RJ: Factors associated with herbal use among urban multiethnic primary care patients: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2004, 4: 18-10.1186/1472-6882-4-18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmer JR, Boggs DA, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L: Family history of cancer and risk of breast cancer in the Black Women's Health Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2009, 20: 1733-1737. 10.1007/s10552-009-9425-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenlee H, Kwan ML, Ergas IJ, Sherman KJ, Krathwohl SE, Bonnell C, Lee MM, Kushi LH: Complementary and alternative therapy use before and after breast cancer diagnosis: the Pathways Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009, 117: 653-665. 10.1007/s10549-009-0315-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennedy J: Herb and supplement use in the US adult population. Clin Ther. 2005, 27: 1847-1858. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee MM, Lin SS, Wrensch MR, Adler SR, Eisenberg D: Alternative therapies used by women with breast cancer in four ethnic populations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 42-47. 10.1093/jnci/92.1.42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kronenberg F, Cushman LF, Wade CM, Kalmuss D, Chao MT: Race/ethnicity and women's use of complementary and alternative medicine in the United States: results of a national survey. Am J Public Health. 2006, 96: 1236-1242. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.047688.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Caan B, Sternfeld B, Gunderson E, Coates A, Quesenberry C, Slattery ML: Life After Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) Study: a cohort of early stage breast cancer survivors (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2005, 16: 545-556. 10.1007/s10552-004-8340-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gunther S, Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Stratton KL, White E: Demographic and health-related correlates of herbal and specialty supplement use. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004, 104: 27-34. 10.1016/j.jada.2003.10.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bertisch SM, Wee CC, McCarthy EP: Use of complementary and alternative therapies by overweight and obese adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008, 16: 1610-1615. 10.1038/oby.2008.239.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/11/30/prepub

Copyright

© Bright-Gbebry et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement