Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Association of Health Literacy with Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use: A Cross-Sectional Study in Adult Primary Care Patients

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201111:138

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-138

Received: 16 August 2011

Accepted: 30 December 2011

Published: 30 December 2011

Abstract

Background

In the United States, it is estimated that 40% of adults utilize complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies. Recently, national surveys report that over 90 million adults have inadequate health literacy. To date, no study has assessed health literacy and its effect on CAM use. The primary objective of this study was to assess the relationship between health literacy and CAM use independent of educational attainment. Second objective was to evaluate the differential effect of health literacy on CAM use by race.

Methods

351 patients were recruited from an outpatient primary care clinic. Validated surveys assessed CAM use (I-CAM-Q), health literacy (REALM-R), and demographic information. We compared demographics by health literacy (adequate vs. inadequate) and overall and individual CAM categories by health literacy using chi square statistics. We found a race by health literacy interaction and ran sequential logistic regression models stratified by race to test the association between health literacy and overall CAM use (Model 1), Model 1 + education (Model 2), and Model 2 + other demographic characteristics (Model 3). We reported the adjusted effect of health literacy on CAM use for both whites and African Americans separately.

Results

75% of the participants had adequate literacy and 80% used CAM. CAM use differed by CAM category. Among whites, adequate health literacy was significantly associated with increased CAM use in both unadjusted (Model 1, OR 7.68; p = 0.001) and models adjusted for education (Model 2, OR 7.70; p = 0.002) and other sociodemographics (Model 3, OR 9.42; p = 0.01). Among African Americans, adequate health literacy was not associated with CAM use in any of the models.

Conclusions

We found a race by literacy interaction suggesting that the relationship between health literacy and CAM use differed significantly by race. Adequate health literacy among whites is associated with increased CAM use, but not associated with CAM use in African Americans.

Background

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is defined by the United States National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) as "a group of diverse medical and healthcare systems, practices, and products that are not presently considered to be part of conventional medicine" [1]. In the United States, it is estimated that 83 million adults [2, 3] utilize CAM with total out-of pocket expenditures approaching $33.9 billion yearly [4].

CAM use is common among patients with medical illnesses [59] and has been associated with an increased number of chronic conditions [10, 11], and greater healthcare utilization [12]. Studies also suggest that CAM use is related to socioeconomic variables such as higher educational attainment [6, 1316] and income status [15]. Higher CAM use has also been associated with health behavior such as lower medication adherence in certain populations [1719]. In addition, CAM use has also been associated with health outcomes such as quality of life measures [2023].

Research has also focused on health literacy and its relationship to chronic disease management and clinical outcomes [2427]. Health literacy is defined as "the ability to access, understand, evaluate and communicate information as a way to promote, maintain and improve health in a variety of settings across the life-course." [28]. Recent national surveys report that over one-third of adults have limited health literacy [29]. Studies indicate that patient health literacy skills are associated with disease knowledge and self-management [2427], medication adherence [30], quality of life [31, 32] and clinical outcomes [27, 33, 34]. Studies also suggest that correlations exist between health literacy status and socioeconomic status [33, 3537]. In addition, evidence exists that educational attainment may not inevitably predict health literacy skills [25]. This is of importance since many population surveys that measure educational attainment do not include separate measures for health literacy.

In studies among patients with chronic illnesses, health literacy, along with CAM use, has been associated with health behavior. Examining the possible relationship between health literacy and CAM use may expand our understanding of behavioral determinants. Given research that CAM use may differ by race [3], analysis by racial categories may further delineate the overall impact of health literacy on CAM use. The knowledge of how these factors relate may benefit future interventional studies aimed at therapeutic targets that modify patient behavior. To our knowledge, few studies have assessed the relationship between health literacy status and CAM use. In addition, few studies have assessed the independent association between health literacy and CAM use by racial categories. The first objective of this study was to assess the association between health literacy and CAM use independent of educational attainment utilizing a valid CAM measure. The second objective was to evaluate the differential effect of health literacy on CAM use by race. Based upon prior literature, we hypothesized that adequate health literacy would predict increasing CAM use and further hypothesize that this relationship would differ by race and that whites with adequate literacy would have increased CAM use compared to African Americans.

Methods

Sample

351 patients at an adult primary care clinic of an academic medical center in the southeastern United States were recruited for the study. The clinic assesses adults aged eighteen and older with the patient volume remaining the same across most months. Study patients were recruited over a 10-week period in the summer months. The time frame for recruitment was chosen in line with a research course for undergraduate students undertaking research projects. Our sample size estimation was based on determining a difference between health literacy status (adequate vs. inadequate) and CAM use (type 1 error rate of 0.05). Consenting patients completed validated surveys to assess health literacy, CAM use, and socio-demographic information. Approval for the study was obtained from our Institutional Review Board.

Demographic variables

Age was assessed as a categorical variable: 16-34 years, 35-49 years, 50-64 years, and 65 or greater years old. Race/ethnicity was categorized as white, black and Hispanic or other racial origin. Marital status was categorized as currently married and not married. Four levels of education were created: less than high school graduate, equal to high school graduate/no college, less than college graduate, and greater than college graduate. Employment status was categorized as currently employed and unemployed. Personal income was categorized as ≤ $10,000, ≤ $25,000, ≤ $50,000, < $75,000 and ≥ $75,000. Four categories of insurance status were created: private, Medicaid, Medicare, and uninsured. Health status was based on the individual's current opinion of his or her health in comparison to 12 months previously (better, same, or worse than 12 months ago). For this analysis, perceived health status was categorized as better, same and worse.

Health literacy

We assessed health literacy by using the Revised Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-R), an eight-item instrument designed to rapidly screen patients for potential health literacy problems. The REALM-R has been previously correlated with the Wide Range Achievement Test Revised (WRAT-R) (0.64) and a score of 6 on the REALM-R identified 26 of 30 persons scoring more than 1 standard deviation below the mean on the WRAT-R, corresponding to a sixth grade reading level" [38]. The REALM-R also has a shorter response burden than the WRAT-R and demonstrated a Cronbach's α of 0.91 [38]. The REALM-R is scored on a scale of 0 to 8 and asks patients to read a series of eight medical words, and a correct response is given for each correct pronunciation. These words include: osteporosis, allergic, jaundice, anemia, fatigue, directed, colitis and contipated. Scores of 6 or less correspond to a grade 6 reading level and identify patients at risk for poor health literacy [38]. For this analysis, health literacy was categorized as adequate health literacy (REALM-R > 6) and inadequate literacy (REALM-R ≤ 6).

CAM use

We assessed CAM use using the International Questionnaire to Measure Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q) developed and tested by the National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM) in Norway [39]. The I-CAM-Q asked patients if they had used herbs/herbal medicine, vitamins/minerals, and homeopathic remedies in the last 12 months. It also asked patients if they had used any of the following self-help practices in the last 12 months: meditation; yoga; qigong; tai chi; relaxation techniques; visualization, attending a traditional healing ceremony; or prayer for own health. For each type of CAM use, respondents were asked to indicate if they currently use it, main reason for last use, and to evaluate how helpful they found it [39]. For this analysis, CAM use was defined as using any of the above modalities or self-help practices.

Statistical analysis

We performed three sets of analysis. First, we ran a confirmatory factor analysis to determine the factor structure of the REALM-R and calculated Cronbach's α for REALM-R to establish its internal consistency in our study population. Second, we compared sample demographics by health literacy status (adequate vs. inadequate), and compared overall CAM use and individual CAM categories by health literacy status using chi-squared statistics. Third, we tested and found a race by literacy interaction in our analysis. We subsequently ran sequential logistic regression models stratified by race to test the association between health literacy and overall CAM use (Model 1), health literacy and overall CAM use controlling for education (Model 2), and health literacy and overall CAM use controlling for both education and other demographic characteristics (Model 3). We only report significant findings for both whites and African Americans separately because of the interaction. For each regression model, overall CAM use (meditation, yoga, tai chi, relaxation, visualization, traditional healing, prayer, herbal medicine, vitamins, and homeopathy) was the dependent variable, and health literacy was the primary independent variable with education and other demographic variables (age, sex, marital status, household income, and health status) sequentially added in the model as covariates. All analyses were performed with STATA version 10 (Stata Corp. LP, College Station, TX), and a two-tailed α of 0.05 was used to assess for significance. Variables were included in the model based on clinical relevance.

Results

Factor analysis, internal consistency and reliability

The principal component analysis yielded an 8-item Realm-R with one factor having a measured eigenvalue of 5.02 that accounting for 63% of the variance. The eigenvalues provide the variance explained by each factor. Factor loadings ranged from 0.77 to 0.82. All individual items correlated at greater than 0.75 with this factor [40].

An item analysis for the 8-item Realm-R revealed a Cronbach's α of 0.91. The item-test correlation of the 8-item Realm-R ranged from 0.79 to 0.84 and the item analysis showed that alpha would not be meaningfully improved by dropping any one item from the scale.

Overall sample characteristics

A total of 351 men and women were invited and recruited. 347 (98.8%) participants completed the surveys. 142 respondents (41%) were African American. Table 1 shows the demographics of the study by health literacy status. In the study, 75% of the patients had adequate health literacy and 25% had inadequate health literacy. Participants with adequate literacy were more likely to be over 50 years old(50+; 55.3%), white (68.8%), female (69%), married (55%), college graduate or higher (51.2%), employed (61.6%), have a household income > $75,000 (31.2%), have private insurance (67.1%), and reported their health status as better or same as last year (84.2%).
Table 1

Sample Characteristics by Health Literacy Levels

Characteristics (n = 347)

Adequate Health Literacy

(REALM-R > 6)

Inadequate Health Literacy

(REALM-R < 6)

P-value

 

260(74.9)

87(25.0)

 

Age Categories

   

   16-34 years

23.1

12.8

0.120

   35-49 years

21.6

20.9

 

   50-64 years

32.6

44.2

 

   65 + years

22.8

22.1

 

Race

   

   Black

27.7

82.7

< 0.001*

   White

68.8

14.9

 

   Hispanic/Other

3.5

2.3

 

Gender

   

   Male

31.0

36.0

0.387

   Female

68.9

63.9

 

Marital status

   

   Currently married

55.0

32.5

< 0.001*

   Not married

44.9

67.5

 

Education categories

   

   Less than high school graduate

8.3

23.8

< 0.001*

   High school graduate

17.8

47.6

 

   Less than college graduate

22.6

20.2

 

   College graduate or higher

51.2

8.3

 

Employment status

   

   Currently employed

61.6

43.5

0.003*

   Unemployed

38.4

56.5

 

Income categories

   

   < $10,000

10.9

30.5

< 0.001*

   $10,000-< $25,000

13.4

42.7

 

   $25,000-< $50.000

24.3

18.3

 

   $50,000-< $75,000

20.2

6.1

 

   $75,000 +

31.1

2.4

 

Insurance status

   

   Private

67.1

36.1

< 0.001*

   Medicaid

7.5

18.1

 

   Medicare

20.2

27.7

 

   Uninsured

5.2

18.1

 

Health status

   

   Better or same as last year

84.2

87.1

0.527

   Worse than last year

15.8

12.9

 

* p <0.05

Sample characteristics by health literacy

In our sample, there were significant differences in health literacy level by demographic characteristics. Adequate health literacy was higher among white and Hispanic/other race compared to black race (93% white, 82% Hispanic/other versus 49% black; p < 0.001), and also higher among married (84% married versus 67% unmarried; p < 0.001), employed (81% employed versus 67% unemployed; p = 0.003), and the ones who had health insurance (85% privately insured versus 46% noninsured; p < 0.001). Adequate health literacy was higher among those with higher educational attainment (95% > college graduate versus 51% < high school graduate; p < 0.001), and higher household income (98% > $75,000 versus 52% < $10,000; p < 0.001), Gender and perceived health status were not statistically different by health literacy level.

Health literacy and different types of CAM use

Health literacy status (adequate vs. inadequate) varied by category of CAM use. Table 2 displays health literacy status and the different types of CAM use. In our overall sample, 80% of the participants used CAM. Categorized by health literacy levels, 82% of those with adequate health literacy used CAM, while 74% of those with inadequate health literacy used CAM and this difference did not attain statistical significance. By CAM use category: 17% used meditation (14% adequate vs. 24% inadequate; p = 0.03) and 56% used vitamins (61% adequate vs. 42% inadequate; p = 0.003) which were both statistically significant.
Table 2

Health Literacy and different types of CAM use

Types of CAM use

All

(%)

Adequate Health Literacy

(%)

Inadequate Health Literacy

(%)

P value

Overall CAM use

278(80.1)

214(82.3)

64(73.6)

0.077

Vitamins

192(56.3)

156(60.9)

36(42.4)

0.003*

Prayer

177(51.6)

126(49.2)

51(58.6)

0.130

Relaxation

60(17.8)

44(17.5)

16(18.6)

0.810

Meditation

57(16.7)

36(14.1)

21(24.1)

0.030*

Herbal Medications

46(13.7)

32(12.8)

14(16.5)

0.396

Yoga

22(6.4)

19(7.4)

3(3.5)

0.201

Visualization

19(5.6)

17(6.7)

2(2.3)

0.129

Homeopathy

14(4.3)

9(3.7)

5(6.1)

0.348

Tai Chi

3(0.9)

1(0.4)

2(2.4)

0.094

Attended traditional healing ceremony

3(0.9)

1(0.4)

2(2.4)

0.092

* p <0.05. Percentage includes all respondents.

Fifty-two percent used prayer (49% adequate vs. 59% inadequate), 18% used relaxation (18% adequate vs. 19% inadequate), 14% used herbal medications (13% adequate vs. 17% inadequate), 6% of the sample used yoga (7% adequate vs. 4% inadequate), 5% used visualization (7% adequate vs. 2% inadequate), 4% used homeopathy (4% adequate vs. 6% inadequate) < 1% used tai chi (0.4% adequate vs. 2% inadequate), < 1% attended traditional healing (0.4% adequate vs. 2% inadequate), and which were not statistically significant. No subjects used qigong as a CAM modality and subsequently this modality was excluded from our analysis.

Table 3 shows sequentially built logistic models of CAM use. Our analysis did show a significant race literacy interaction and subsequent testing of our separate models by racial category (Table 3) revealed that adequate health literacy among whites was associated with increased CAM use (Model 1, OR 7.68; 95% CI 2.35-25.1, p = 0.001). Adequate health literacy among whites remained significantly associated with increased CAM use after controlling for education (Model 2, OR 7.70; 95% CI 2.14-27.7, p = 0.002) and other demographics (Model 3, OR 9.42; 95% CI 1.66-53.5; p = 0.01). Adequate health literacy among African Americans was not significantly associated with CAM use (Model 1, OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.50-2.64; p = 0.74 and remained not significantly associated with CAM use after controlling for education (Model 2, OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.33-2.23; p = 0.76) and socio-demographics (Model 3, OR 0.97 95% CI 0.27-3.48; p = 0.96).
Table 3

Sequentially-Built Logistic Models of CAM use by racial category*

 

White

(n = 187)

Black

(n = 133)

 

Odds Ratio

(95% CI)

P-value

Odds Ratio

(95% CI)

P-value

Model 1: Adequate Health Literacy Only

(Ref: Inadequate Health Literacy)

7.68

(2.35,25.1)

0.001

1.15

(0.50,2.64)

0.735

Model 2: Adequate Health Literacy and Education Only

(Ref: Inadequate Health Literacy)

7.70

(2.14,27.7)

0.002

0.86

(0.33,2.23)

0.756

Model 3: Adequate Health Literacy and Socio-Demographics

(Ref: Inadequate Health Literacy)

9.42

(1.66,53.5)

0.011

0.97

(0.27,3.48)

0.958

* Model 1-unadjusted. Model 2- adjusted for education category (< high school graduate, high school graduate, < college graduate, college graduate+). Model 3- adjusted for socio-demographics (education category, age category, gender, income, employment status, marital status, and health status).

Discussion

In our study we found a race by literacy interaction suggesting that the relationship between CAM use and health literacy differed significantly by race. Consistent with our hypothesis, our analysis by race revealed that CAM use was related to adequate health literacy among whites however, CAM use was not related to health literacy among African Americans. Among whites, the relationship between CAM use and adequate literacy remained significant after adjusting for educational attainment and other sociodemographic variables. Also, health literacy levels were higher among whites as compared to African Americans suggesting that adequate health literacy may predict overall CAM use. This is consistent with research that health literacy skills are associated with health seeking behaviors [41, 42].

Our results also indicate that health literacy status differed by CAM use category. Specifically, adequate health literacy was associated with vitamin use while inadequate health literacy was associated with meditation use. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that only a small portion of our patients used meditation compared to vitamins. The small sample of patients that used meditation (n = 57) may not reflect actual relationships in the population as a whole. Also, unmeasured patient level factors may have influenced our results. For instance, it is possible that patients with cormorbid illnesses and subsequent disease familiarity may be more apt to take pill based therapies compared to other CAM modalities based upon prior familiarity with medications. Larger population studies including patient level factors such as health knowledge and health literacy need to be conducted to accurately predict the independent relationship between health literacy and different CAM modalities.

Although national estimates indicate that whites are more likely use CAM than African Americans [2], previous national surveys lacked measures of health literacy. Factors such as health literacy may explain the propensity to use CAM in certain populations. In addition, although higher educational attainment has been associated with increased CAM use [6, 1316], years of schooling may not necessarily predict reading ability [25]. This suggests that both educational attainment and health literacy need to be included in studies assessing possible determinants of CAM use. In our study, among whites, reading ability related to utilizing CAM even after adjusting for educational attainment and other sociodemographic factors. One possible explanation is that CAM may attract white patients with increased reading skills regardless of years of schooling or socioeconomic status. An implication of this finding is that patients with improved reading skills may utilize CAM for health promotion or health education purposes. Studies including health literacy, CAM use and preventative care or disease self-management outcomes may provide insight into whether health literacy skills influence the relationship between CAM use and patient health behavior in this racial group. Of note, among African Americans, we did not find an association between health literacy and CAM use. This suggests that other factors may influence CAM use among African Americans. Given our findings, additional studies are needed to corroborate our findings and investigate the mechanism by which health literacy relates to CAM use by race.

This study has some limitations. The current study was cross-sectional in nature and cannot speak to temporal relationships or causality. Second, this study was conducted at a single academic center and it is possible that the subjects in this study were better educated and more likely to have adequate health literacy skills than those at community clinics or rural areas. It is also possible that patients in an academic center were more likely to use CAM secondary to having a higher number of chronic conditions. Third, although adapted and tested, the I-CAM-Q may require further validation and may not have included all CAM therapies utilized in our population. Furthermore, our analysis did not include reasons for CAM use. Additional analysis including reasons for CAM use may have assisted in understanding the distribution of CAM use in our population. Fourth, although the REALM-R is a valid measure of health literacy, it uses medical terms which may not reflect the ability of participants to read CAM related words. Fifth, the lack of effect of health literacy among African American respondents might have been the result of inadequate sample size. Sixth, our study was cross sectional and selection bias is always a possibility. The high response rate in our sample may have minimized the effect of this bias.

Conclusion

Although previous studies have demonstrated that CAM use is associated with educational attainment [6, 1316], to our knowledge this is the first study to examine the association between health literacy and CAM use. In summary, we found a race by literacy interaction suggesting that the relationship between health literacy and CAM use differed significantly by race. We found that adequate health literacy among whites is associated with increased CAM use as compared to African Americans. This implies that racial differences exist regarding the relationship of health literacy with CAM use. Further research is needed to examine the possible mechanisms by which health literacy and CAM use are related. These studies should include analysis of reasons for CAM use in order to provide insight into what environmental factors contribute to CAM use. These efforts may help identify which internal and external factors in a diverse population increase the likelihood of CAM use.

List of abbreviations

I-CAM-Q: 

International Complementary Alternative Medicine Questionnaire

REALM-R: 

Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the summer students who helped with data collection, staff and faculty at the participating clinic and everyone who participated in the study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina
(2)
Center for Disease Prevention and Health Interventions for Diverse Populations, Ralph H Johnson VA Medical Center
(3)
Center for Health Disparities Research, Medical University of South Carolina

References

  1. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Accessed May 22, 2010, [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/#1]
  2. Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL: Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States 2007. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008, 12: 1-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM: Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults:1997-2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005, 11 (1): 42-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Nahin RL, Barnes PM, Stussman BJ, Bloom B: Costs of complementary and alternative (CAM) and frequency of visits to CAM practitioners: United States 2007. National health Stat Report. 2009, 18: 1-14.Google Scholar
  5. Fairfield KM, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB: Patterns of use, expenditures, and perceived efficacy of complementary and alternative therapies in HIV-infected patients. Arch Intern Med. 1998, 158 (20): 2257-64. 10.1001/archinte.158.20.2257.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Egede LE, Ye X, Zheng D, Silverstein MD: The prevalence and pattern of complementary and alternative medicine use in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002, 25 (2): 324-9. 10.2337/diacare.25.2.324.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nayak S, Matheis RJ, Schoenberger NE, Shiflett SC: Use of unconventional therapies by individuals with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil. 2003, 17 (2): 181-91. 10.1191/0269215503cr604oa.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Montazeri A, Sajadian A, Ebrahimi M, Akbari ME: Depression and the use of complementary medicine among breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2005, 13 (5): 339-42. 10.1007/s00520-004-0709-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chong CA, Diaz-Granados N, Hawker GA: Complementary and alternative medicine use by osteoporosis clinic patients. Osteoporos Int. 2007, 18 (11): 1547-56. 10.1007/s00198-007-0417-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Millar WJ: Use of alternative health care practitioners by Canadians. Can J Public Health. 1997, 88 (3): 154-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ai AL, Bolling SF: The use of complementary and alternative therapies among middle-aged and older cardiac patients. Am J Med Qual. 2002, 17 (1): 21-7. 10.1177/106286060201700105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Li JZ, Quinn JV, McCulloch CE: Patterns of complementary and alternative medicine use in ED patients and its association with health care utilization. Am J Emerg Med. 2004, 22 (3): 187-91. 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Field KM, Jenkins MA, Friedlander ML: Predictors of the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by women at high risk for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45 (4): 551-60. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Barner JC, Bohman TM, Brown CM: Use of complementary and alternative medicine for treatment among African-Americans: a multivariate analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010, 6 (3): 196-208. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.08.001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown C, Barner J, Bohman T, Richards K: A multivariate test of an expanded Andersen Health Care utilization model for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in African Americans. J Altern Complement Med. 2009, 15 (8): 911-9. 10.1089/acm.2008.0561.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Wyatt G, Sikorskii A, Wills CE, Su H: Complementary and alternative medicine use, spending, and quality of life in early stage breast cancer. Nurs Res. 2009, 59 (1): 58-66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Jernewall N, Zea MC, Reisen CA, Poppen PJ: Complementary and alternative medicine and adherence to care among HIV-positive Latino gay and bisexual men. AIDS Care. 2005, 17 (5): 601-9. 10.1080/09540120512331314295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gohar F, Greenfield SM, Beevers DG: Self-care and adherence to medication: a survey in the hypertension outpatient clinic. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008, 8: 4-10.1186/1472-6882-8-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Krousel-Wood MA, Muntner P, Joyce CJ: Adverse effects of complementary and alternative medicine on antihypertensive medication adherence: findings from the cohort study of medication adherence among older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010, 58 (1): 54-61. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02639.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Buettner C, Kroenke CH, Phillips RS: Correlates of use of different types of complementary and alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in the nurses' health study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006, 100 (2): 219-27. 10.1007/s10549-006-9239-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hlubocky FJ, Ratain MJ, Wen M, Daugherty CK: Complementary and alternative 0 medicine among advanced cancer patients enrolled on phase I trials: a study of prognosis, quality of life, and preferences for decision making. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25 (5): 548-54. 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawsin C, DuHamel K, Itzkowitz SH: Demographic, medical, and psychosocial correlates to CAM use among survivors of colorectal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2007, 15 (5): 557-64. 10.1007/s00520-006-0198-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yamada K: Low level of quality of life in patients with mental and behavioral disorders wanting complementary and alternative (kampo) therapy. Qual Life Res. 2007, 16 (5): 787-92. 10.1007/s11136-007-9179-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams MV, Baker DW, Parker RM, Nurss JR: Relationship of functional health literacy to patients' knowledge of their chronic disease. A study of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 1998, 158 (2): 166-72. 10.1001/archinte.158.2.166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Williams MV, Baker DW, Honig EG: Inadequate literacy is a barrier to asthma knowledge and self-care. Chest. 1998, 114 (4): 1008-15. 10.1378/chest.114.4.1008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalichman SC, Rompa D: Functional health literacy is associated with health status an health-related knowledge in people living with HIV-AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000, 25 (4): 337-44. 10.1097/00126334-200012010-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cavanaugh K, Huizinga MM, Wallston KA: Association of numeracy and diabetes control. Ann Intern Med. 2008, 148 (10): 737-46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rootman I, Gordon-el-Bihbety D: A Vision for a Health Literate Canada. Report of the Expert Panel on Health Literacy. 2008, Ottawa, ON: Canada Public Health AssociationGoogle Scholar
  29. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C: The health literacy of America's results: results from the 2003 national assessement of adult literacy. 2006, Washington, DC: NCES. U.S. Dept. of EducationGoogle Scholar
  30. Gazmararian JA, Kripalani S, Miller MJ: Factors associated with medication refill adherence in cardiovascular-related diseases: a focus on health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2006, 21 (12): 1215-21. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00591.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mancuso CA, Rincon M: Impact of health literacy on longitudinal asthma outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2006, 21 (8): 813-7. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00528.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Bautista RE, Glen ET, Shetty NK, Wludyka P: The association between health literacy and outcomes of care among epilepsy patients. Seizure. 2009, 18 (6): 400-4. 10.1016/j.seizure.2009.02.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J: Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002, 288 (4): 475-82. 10.1001/jama.288.4.475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Baker DW, Wolf MS, Feinglass J: Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons. Arch Intern Med. 2007, 167 (14): 1503-9. 10.1001/archinte.167.14.1503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim S, Love F, Quistberg DA, Shea JA: Association of health literacy with self-management behavior in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004, 12: 2980-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothman R, Malone R, Bryant B: The relationship between literacy and glycemic control in a diabetes disease-management program. Diabetes Educ. 2004, 30 (2): 263-73. 10.1177/014572170403000219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Shea JA, Beers BB, McDonald VJ: Assessing health literacy in African American and Caucasian adults: disparities in rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine (REALM) scores. Fam Med. 2004, 8: 575-81.Google Scholar
  38. Bass PF, Wilson JF, Griffith CH: A shortened instrument for literacy screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2003, 18 (12): 1036-8. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.10651.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Quandt SA, Verhoef MJ, Arcury TA: Development of an international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-Q). J Altern Complement Med. 2009, 15 (4): 331-9. 10.1089/acm.2008.0521.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Nunnally JC, Bernstein I: Psychometric Theory. 1994, New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  41. Scott TL, Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Baker DW: Health literacy and preventive health care use among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. Med Care. 2002, 40 (5): 395-404. 10.1097/00005650-200205000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. von Wagner C, Knight K, Steptoe A, Wardle J: Functional health literacy and health-promoting behaviour in a national sample of British adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007, 61 (12): 1086-90. 10.1136/jech.2006.053967.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/11/138/prepub

Copyright

© Bains and Egede; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement