Phenolic content and antioxidant property of the bark extracts of Ziziphus mucronata Willd. subsp. mucronata Willd
© Olajuyigbe and Afolayan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 21 April 2011
Accepted: 16 December 2011
Published: 16 December 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Victor Kuete|
|5 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fehmi Odabasoglu|
|12 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - mohammad ali ebrahimzadeh|
|22 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aline Lamien Meda|
|13 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - AJ Afolayan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - AJ Afolayan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - AJ Afolayan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Dec 2011||Editorially accepted|
|16 Dec 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-11-130|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.